<\/p>\n
UFO\u2019s are still being studied<\/strong><\/span> \u00a9 D.R. <\/p>\n The Belgian Wave : almost 20 years<\/p>\n On March 30th 1990, in the middle of the Belgian wave, the Belgian Air Force opened a file after the chasing of a UFO by two F-16 above the Belgian territory. Two radars on the ground had located and recorded a signal without knowing its origin. The two F-16 chased the UFO but the signal suddenly disappeared.<\/p>\n The copy of the radar recordings of the two F-16 has been analyzed by the physicist Auguste Meesen and then by people from Washington (who confirmed that none of their planes flew above the Belgian territory). The military still can\u2019t explain what went on that day and have no explanation whatsoever as for the origin of the chased object. <\/p>\n Patrick Ferryn, documentary director and long standing ufologist, has reopened the file with his friends of the Copeps (the Sobeps was dissolved six months ago and was replaced by the Cobeps which is not a non profit-making association any more).<\/p>\n They wish to make further analysis so that we can come to new hypotheses. But they do not only focus on the file of the F-16. They also gather documents on the Belgian wave and question new witnesses near Eupen en are looking for experts who would wish to work on negatives and videos with more recent technologies (in particular a color film from a pilot of Air France).<\/p>\n It is now almost 20 years that the Belgian UFO wave took place. Since then a lot of organizations have seen the light in the US (Project Disclosure), in France, in England, with the intention of disclosing to the public the information gathered by the army and the government. Why doesn’t the same thing happen here and why doesn’t our government play the game of transparency on such a vital subject in everyone’s interest?"<\/p>\n \u00a9 La Derni\u00e8re Heure 2008 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n DH Infos > Faits divers \u00a9 D.R. BRUXELLES La vague belge est la p\u00e9riode de 1989 \u00e0 1991, consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme la plus importante du monde, durant laquelle a eu lieu un nombre \u00e9lev\u00e9 de t\u00e9moignages d’observations d’ovnis dans la r\u00e9gion d’Eupen, la province de Hainaut et celle de Namur. <\/p>\n La vague belge : presque vingt ans<\/p>\n Le 30 mars 1990, en pleine vague belge, un dossier est ouvert par la Force A\u00e9rienne Belge apr\u00e8s la poursuite d’un ovni dans le ciel braban\u00e7on par deux chasseurs F-16. Deux radars au sol avaient rep\u00e9r\u00e9 et enregistr\u00e9 un signal sans conna\u00eetre sa provenance. Les avions se sont lanc\u00e9s \u00e0 sa poursuite, mais le signal s’est soudainement interrompu.<\/p>\n La copie des enregistrements radar des avions avait \u00e9t\u00e9 soumise au professeur et physicien Auguste Meessen, puis \u00e0 des gens de Washington (qui confirm\u00e8rent qu’aucun de leurs avions n’\u00e9tait sur le territoire belge). Les militaires n’expliquent toujours pas ce qui s’est pass\u00e9 ce jour-l\u00e0, ni ce que les avions de chasse ont poursuivi. <\/p>\n Patrick Ferryn, r\u00e9alisateur de documentaires et ufologue de longue date, a rouvert ce dossier avec ses amis de la Cobeps ( la Sobeps a \u00e9t\u00e9 dissoute il y a six mois et a \u00e9t\u00e9 remplac\u00e9e par la Cobeps, qui n’est plus une ASBL ). <\/p>\n Ceux-ci souhaitent soumettre cette affaire \u00e0 des analyses suppl\u00e9mentaires afin d’\u00e9mettre de nouvelles hypoth\u00e8ses. Mais ils ne s’occupent pas exclusivement du dossier des F-16. Ils rassemblent aussi des documents sur la vague belge, ils interrogent de nouveaux t\u00e9moins pr\u00e8s d’Eupen et recherchent des experts qui voudraient travailler photos et vid\u00e9os avec des technologies plus actuelles (notamment une vid\u00e9o couleurs film\u00e9e par un pilote d’Air France).<\/p>\n Cela fera bient\u00f4t vingt ans que la vague belge a eu lieu. Depuis, des commissions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 cr\u00e9\u00e9es aux \u00c9tats-Unis (Project Disclosure), en Angleterre, en France, afin de transmettre \u00e0 la population les informations de l’arm\u00e9e et du gouvernement sur les ovnis. Pas en Belgique. Pourquoi le pays ne joue-t-il pas la carte de la transparence sur un sujet pourtant susceptible de toucher l’int\u00e9r\u00eat commun ? <\/p>\n \u00a9 La Derni\u00e8re Heure 2008 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
(07\/08\/2008)<\/p>\n
The negative taken in 1990 in Petit-Rechain (Belgium) is still being studied by scientists
BRUSSELS The Belgian wave is the period from 1989 to 1991 which is being considered as the most important in the world and during which a lot of observations took place in the region of Eupen, province of Hainaut and Namur.
The \u00ab Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 belge d\u2019\u00e9tudes des ph\u00e9nom\u00e8nes spatiaux \u00bb SOBEPS (Belgian company for the study of spatial phenomena) claims to have been able to collect more than 2.000 testimonies en has more than 20.000 pages of investigation reports. (www.sobeps.org).
In the night of April 4th 1990, not far away from Verviers, at Petit-Rechain, two witnesses, Mrs. S. and Mr. P. M., saw three round shining lights in the sky, forming a triangle with broken angles, with a luminous circle in the centre of the triangle, the whole being almost stationary and producing no sound at all, except what could be considered a kind of humming sound.
Mrs. S saw the strange lights at something like 150 meters altitude. She then ran to look for Mr. P. who took his Reflex camera en who finally took the now famous negative of Petit\u2013Rechain.
The members of the Sobeps \u2013 who use investigation methods based on the scientific checking of facts, are reliable. The negative is then analyzed by Marc Acheroy, nuclear physicist at the Royal Military School; by the professor Fran\u00e7ois Louange, who works at the private laboratory for digital imagery and who works with the CNRS and the French Army; by the photo service of the Royal institute of artistic heritage of Belgium which owns a high-performance photo laboratory; en by the doctor Richard Haines who works for Nasa in California. Result, after years of analysis: the negative of Petit-Rechain is not a fake.
Ten years later the Sobeps decided to give the negative to the Optical Institute of Orsay (France) for a second expert opinion. The purpose of that step was to analyze the negative with more recent softwares and to compare the results with the old data. Result: the negative is not a fake; but they discovered something very surprising which until then was invisible: a whirl of particles in motion around the object. Today nobody knows exactly the origin of these particles. It seems to be a propulsion system of advanced technology.
On the basis of old analysis and current investigations, it was not confirmed that the negative of Petit-Rechain was a proof of extraterrestrials but it allowed to lift the veil on a subject which has always been considered as imaginary.
Nicolas Thiry
\u00a9 La Derni\u00e8re Heure 2008 <\/p>\n
Les ovnis toujours examin\u00e9s
(07\/08\/2008)<\/p>\n
Le clich\u00e9 pris en 1990 \u00e0 Petit-Rechain est encore analys\u00e9 par des scientifiques<\/p>\n
La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 belge d’\u00e9tude des ph\u00e9nom\u00e8nes spatiaux de l’\u00e9poque (Sobeps) affirme avoir r\u00e9colt\u00e9 plus de 2.000 t\u00e9moignages et poss\u00e8de 20.000 pages de rapport d’enqu\u00eate (www.sobeps.org).
Dans la nuit du 4 avril 1990, pas loin de Verviers, \u00e0 Petit-Rechain, deux t\u00e9moins, Mlle S. et Mr P. M., ont vu briller dans le ciel trois feux blancs et ronds, formant un triangle aux bords cass\u00e9s, avec un cercle lumineux au centre du triangle, l’ensemble restant quasi immobile et ne produisant aucun son, si ce n’est une sorte de bruissement.
Mlle S. a aper\u00e7u les \u00e9tranges lueurs \u00e0 environ 150 m\u00e8tres d’altitude. Elle court imm\u00e9diatement chercher M. P., qui s’empare de son appareil photo Reflex et prend le fameux clich\u00e9 de Petit-Rechain. Tout s’est d\u00e9roul\u00e9 en \u00e0 peine cinq minutes
Les membres de la Sobeps – dont les m\u00e9thodes d’enqu\u00eates, bas\u00e9es sur la v\u00e9rification scientifique des faits, sont fiables – font analyser le clich\u00e9 par Marc Acheroy, physicien nucl\u00e9aire de l’\u00c9cole royale militaire; par le professeur Fran\u00e7ois Louange, du laboratoire priv\u00e9 d’imagerie digitale qui coop\u00e8re avec le CNRS et l’arm\u00e9e fran\u00e7aise; par le service photo de l’Institut royal du patrimoine artistique de Belgique, poss\u00e9dant un laboratoire photographique performant; et par le docteur Richard Haines, travaillant pour la Nasa en Californie. R\u00e9sultat, apr\u00e8s des ann\u00e9es d’analyses : la photo de Petit-Rechain n’est pas un truquage.
Dix ans plus tard, la Sobeps confie l’image \u00e0 l’Institut d’optique d’Orsay pour une contre-expertise. Le but de la d\u00e9marche est d’analyser le clich\u00e9 avec des logiciels plus r\u00e9cents et de confronter les r\u00e9sultats avec les anciennes donn\u00e9es. R\u00e9sultat : l’image n’est pas truqu\u00e9e; mais ils ont d\u00e9couvert quelque chose d’assez surprenant qui \u00e9tait invisible jusque-l\u00e0 : un tourbillon de particules en mouvement autour du v\u00e9hicule. \u00c0 l’heure actuelle, personne ne conna\u00eet r\u00e9ellement la nature de ces particules. Il s’agirait d’un syst\u00e8me de propulsion de technologie avanc\u00e9e.
Sur base des analyses pass\u00e9es et des enqu\u00eates en cours, la photo de Petit-Rechain ne confirme nullement l’existence d’extraterrestres, mais elle a permis de lever un voile et de questionner sur un sujet toujours consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme fantaisiste.
Nicolas Thiry
\u00a9 La Derni\u00e8re Heure 2008 <\/p>\n