<\/p>\n
NOTE: "Exopolitics" was nominated by the American Dialect Society as 2005 Word of the Year.<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.americandialect.org\/Words_of_the_Year_2005_Preview.pdf http:\/\/static.wikipedia.org\/new\/wikipedia\/en\/articles\/e\/x\/o\/Exopolitics.html<\/a> Press Release – 6\/24\/08 – Washington<\/span><\/em>, <\/span><\/em>DC<\/span><\/em> First Google Wikipedia is a powerful The Administrator\/OCG in this instance First PRG executive director <\/span><\/span>"In any event, every time "Neither government suppression nor <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki Contact<\/span><\/span><\/strong>: Stephen Bassett <\/span>______________________________ <\/span><\/p>\n
<\/a>
Deletcd "Exopolitics" Article from Wikipedia:<\/p>\n
Paradigm
\nResearch Group <\/em><\/p>\n
\nWikipression<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n
\n\u2013 A second instance of censorship has taken place related to matters
\nexopolitical.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\ndeletes or blocks listings from the top of search returns; now after three
\nyears an Administrator at Wikipedia has removed the "Exopolitics"
\narticle from the online "people’s" encyclopedia.
\nThis from a publication with huge articles on Britney Spears, the
\nIncredible Hulk and Mr. Ed (the talking horse). Efforts to
\nget the article reinstated were rebuffed, and essentially impossible,
\ngiven the absurd complexity of Wikiprocedures.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nconcept. Six percent of all web users access it. It draws
\nupon the collective intellectual resource to create something with huge
\npotential. Sadly, in order to deal with attendant issues such as
\ninaccuracy, vandalism and malicious intent, operationally it has become an
\nimpenetrable, incomprehensible labyrinth populated by obsessive-compulsive
\ngeeks who rule over imaginary fiefdoms while hiding behind screen
\nnames.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nwho deleted the "Exopolitics" article goes by the screen name
\n"Sandstein." He has no knowledge of exopolitics, its
\nhistory or the attendant issues and his "decision" was derived
\nfrom a mock consensus of a few other OCG’s who know even less – a
\nrationale based upon the premise that collective ignorance is somehow
\nsmarter than individual ignorance – a case of the arrogant leading the
\nblind. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nGoogle deletes the Open Letter to Senator Hillary Clinton listings at or
\nnear the top of the search returns going into the key
\n<\/span>Indiana<\/span> and
\n<\/span>North
\nCarolina<\/span> primary elections, which
\nmiraculously reappear a few days after the elections are over.
\nNow Wikipedia has deleted the "Exopolitics" article which had
\nbeen in place for over three years.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\nStephen Bassett commented, "It is important to understand that given
\nthe manner in which Wikipedia operates, it is very vulnerable to direct
\ngovernment interference. A "consensus" of a
\nfew "users" is all that is needed to remove an article which is
\nnot to the liking of some element within government. ‘Administrators’ can be planted and affect content,
\nblock users and who knows what else." <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\ncensorship of exopolitical issues by non-governmental entities takes place
\nPRG is going to point it out and name names. Truth embargos
\nremain in place because people and organizations not only believe
\ngovernment propaganda, they step up to help enforce it." <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\ncensorship by the likes of Google or Wikipedia will prevent the inculcation
\nof exopolitics into the mainstream or the end to the truth embargo
\nregarding a non-human intelligence engaging the human race.
\n<\/span><\/span>The press may contact WikiAdministrator
\n"Sandstein" via his Wiki page (and in no other fashion)
\nat:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n <\/span>PRG@paradigmresearchgroup.org<\/span><\/a>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n