{"id":1354,"date":"2008-04-09T13:12:33","date_gmt":"2008-04-09T13:12:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/2008\/04\/09\/dr-paul-laviole\/"},"modified":"2008-04-09T13:12:33","modified_gmt":"2008-04-09T13:12:33","slug":"dr-paul-laviole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/dr-paul-laviole\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr. Paul LaViolette: Was the December 26, 2004 Indonesian Earthquake and Tsunami Caused by a Stellar Explosion 45,000 Light Years Away?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Was the December
\n      26, 2004 Indonesian Earthquake and Tsunami
\n      Caused by a Stellar Explosion 45,000 Light Years Away?
\n      Sound Crazy?  Read Carefully Below.
\n      (<\/span><\/strong>Originally posted
\n      February 20, 2005)<\/span><\/center>
\n      
Gamma Ray Bursts,
\n      Gravity Waves, and Earthquakes<\/span><\/strong><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

    On December 26,
\n      2004 a magnitude 9.3
\n      earthquake <\/a>occurred in the Indian Ocean off the coast of
\n      Sumatra in Malaysia.  It caused a powerful tsunami which
\n      devastated coastal regions of many countries leaving over 240,000
\n      people either dead or missing.  It was the worst tsunami
\n      to affect this area since the 1883 explosion of Krakatao.  The
\n      earthquake that produced it was so strong that it exceeded by
\n      a factor of 10 the next most powerful earthquake to occur anywhere
\n      in the past 25 years.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Indonesian 9.3 Richter earthquake:
\n           December 26, 2004 at 00<\/span>
\n      hours 58<\/span> minutes
\n      (Universal Time)<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

It is then with some alarm that we learn
\n      that just 44.6 hours later<\/em> gamma ray telescopes orbiting
\n      the Earth picked up the arrival of the brightest gamma ray burst
\n      ever recorded<\/em>!<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Gamma ray burst arrival:
\n           December 27, 2004 at 21<\/span>
\n      hours 36<\/span> minutes
\n      (Universal Time)<\/span><\/p>\n

      


\n      
\n      <\/span><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

    This gamma ray
\n      blast was 100 times more intense than any burst that had been
\n      previously recorded, equaling the brightness of the full Moon,
\n      but radiating most of its energy at gamma ray wavelengths.  Gamma
\n      ray counts spiked to a maximum in 1.5 seconds and then declined
\n      over a 5 minute period with 7.57 second pulsations.  The
\n      blast temporarily changed the shape the Earth’s ionosphere, distorting
\n      the transmission of long-wavelength radio signals.  See
\n      stories on Space.com<\/a>,
\n      BBC
\n      News<\/a>, NY
\n      TImes<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

      


\n      Artists conception, courtesy of NASA<\/span><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

     It was
\n      determined that the burst originated from the soft gamma ray
\n      repeater star, SGR 1806-20, a neutron star 20 kilometers in diameter
\n      which rotates once every 7.5 seconds, matching the GRB pulsation
\n      period.  SGR 1806-20 is located about 10 degrees northeast
\n      of the Galactic center and about 20,000 to 32,000 light years
\n      from us, or about as far away as the Galactic center.  (Originally,
\n      it had been thought to be 45,000 light years from us. but new
\n      results place it closer.) The outburst released more energy
\n      in a tenth of a second than the Sun emits in 100,000 years.  Other
\n      gamma ray bursts have been detected whose explosions were intrinsically
\n      more powerful than this one at the source of the explosion, but
\n      since those explosions originated in other galaxies tens of thousands
\n      of times more distant, the bursts were not nearly as bright when
\n      they reached our solar system.  What makes the December
\n      27th gamma ray burst unique is that it is the first time that
\n      a burst this bright<\/em> has been observed, one that also happens
\n      to originate from within our own Galaxy.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

     Astronomers
\n      have theorized that gamma ray bursts might travel in association
\n      with gravity wave bursts.  In the course of their flight
\n      through space, gamma rays would be deflected by gravitational
\n      fields and would be scattered by dust and cosmic ray particles
\n      they encountered, so they would be expected to travel slightly
\n      slower than their associated gravity wave burst which would pass
\n      through space unimpeded.  After a 45,000 year light-speed
\n      journey, a gamma ray burst arrival delay of 44.6 hours would
\n      not be unexpected.  It amounts to a delay of just one part
\n      in 9 million.  So if the gravity wave traveled at the speed
\n      of light (c), the gamma ray burst would have averaged a speed
\n      of 0.99999989 c, just 0.11 millionths slower.  There is
\n      also the possibility that at the beginning of its journey the
\n      gravity wave may have had a superluminal speed; see textbox below.<\/span><\/p>\n

      


\n      Artist’s conception, courtesy of NASA<\/span><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

     The 9.3
\n      Richter earthquake was ten times stronger than any other earthquake
\n      during the past 25 years, and was followed just 44.6 hours
\n      later<\/em> on December 27th by a very intense gamma ray burst,
\n      which was 100 fold brighter than any other in the past 25 year
\n      history of gamma ray observation. It seems difficult to pass
\n      off the temporal proximity of these two Class I events as being
\n      just a matter of coincidence.  A time period of 25 years
\n      compared to a time separation of 44.6 hours amounts to a time
\n      ratio of about 5000:1.  For two such unique events to have
\n      such a close time proximity is highly improbable if they
\n      are not somehow related.  But, as mentioned above, gravity
\n      waves would very likely be associated with gamma ray bursts,
\n      and they would be expected to precede<\/em> them.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

    Many have inquired
\n      if there might be a connection between these two events (e.g.,
\n      see the Space.com<\/a>
\n      article).  Not thinking of the gravity wave connection,
\n      astronomers have been reluctant to admit there might be a connection
\n      since they know of no mechanism by which gamma rays by themselves
\n      could trigger earthquakes.  They admit that the December
\n      27th gamma ray burst had slightly affected the ionization state
\n      of the Earth’s atmosphere, but this by itself should not have
\n      caused earthquakes.  However, if a longitudinal gravity
\n      potential wave pulse were to accompany a gamma ray burst, the
\n      mystery becomes resolved.  The connection between earthquakes
\n      and gamma ray bursts now becomes plausible.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

     In his
\n      1983 Ph.D. dissertation<\/a>,
\n      Paul LaViolette called attention to terrestrial dangers of Galactic
\n      core explosions, pointing out that the arrival of the cosmic
\n      ray superwave they produced would be signaled by a high intensity
\n      gamma ray burst which would also generate EMP effects (e.g.,
\n      see Page 3<\/a>). 
\n      He also noted that a strong gravity wave might be expected to
\n      travel forward at the forefront of this superwave and might be
\n      the first indication of a superwave’s arrival.  He pointed
\n      out that such gravity waves could induce substantial tidal forces
\n      on the Earth during their passage which could induce earthquakes
\n      and cause polar axis torquing effects.  <\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

\n        <\/p>\n

[Please note, the gravity potential gradient
\n        associated with a stellar explosion or core explosion would drop
\n        off in intensity inversely with distance traveled (according
\n        to 1\/r), and would not drop off as the inverse cube of distance
\n        as some have claimed on the internet.  That is, it does
\n        not have a force-distance dependence similar to the lunar tidal
\n        force.  So the impact would be quite significant.  The
\n        mathematics are worked out in the above reference.]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      <\/p>\n

In his book Earth
\n      Under Fire<\/a><\/em> (as well as in his dissertation), LaViolette
\n      presents evidence showing that the superwave that passed through
\n      the solar system around 14,200 years ago had triggered supernova
\n      explosions as it swept through the Galaxy.  Among these
\n      were the Vela and Crab supernova explosions whose explosion dates
\n      align with this superwave event horizon.  He points out
\n      that these explosions could be explained if a gravity wave accompanied
\n      this superwave, it could have produced tidal forces which could
\n      have triggered unstable stars to explode as it passed through.   <\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

    He wrote at a
\n      time when gamma ray bursts had just begun to be discovered, and
\n      when no one was concerned with them as potential terrestrial
\n      hazards.  In recent years scientific opinion has come around
\n      to adopt LaViolette’s concern, as can be seen in news articles
\n      discussing the SGR 1806-20 gamma ray outburst, e.g., see Space.com
\n      news story<\/a>.  They note that if this gamma ray burst
\n      had been as close as 10 light years it would have completely
\n      destroyed the ozone layer.  By comparison, the Galactic
\n      superwaves LaViolette has postulated to have been generated as
\n      a result of an outburst of our Galaxy’s core and to have impacted
\n      the Solar system during the last ice age would have impacted
\n      the solar system with a cosmic ray electron volley having an
\n      energy intensity 100 times greater than this hypothetical 10
\n      light year distant stellar gamma ray burst.   In
\n      comparision, SGR 1806-20 has been estimated to have a stellar
\n      progenitor mass of 150 solar masses, whereas our Galactic core
\n      has a mass of 2.6 million solar masses.  In its present
\n      active phase, SGR 1806-20 is estimated to have a luminosity 40
\n      million times that of the Sun, whereas during its active phase
\n      the Galactic center could reach luminosities of 400 trillion
\n      times that of the Sun.   So it is understandable that
\n      if the Galactic center were to erupt, it would produce a gamma
\n      ray burst and a gravity wave far more intense than the outburst
\n      from this star.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

     If anything,
\n      the December 27, 2004 gamma ray burst shows us that we do not
\n      live in a peaceful celestial environment.  And if the December
\n      26th earthquake was in fact part of this same celestial event,
\n      we see that this stellar eruption has claimed many lives.  For
\n      this reason, it is important that we prepare for the possibility
\n      of even stronger events in the future, the arrival of superwaves
\n      issuing from the core of our Galaxy.  Like the December
\n      26th earthquake and the December 27th gamma ray burst, the next
\n      superwave will arrive unexpectedly.  It will take us by
\n      surprise.
\n      <\/span><\/p>\n

      

      
\n      <\/span><\/p>\n\n        <\/p>\n\n\n          <\/p>\n
\n            
Before<\/span><\/center><\/td>\n

          <\/p>\n

\n            
After<\/span><\/center><\/td>\n

        <\/tr>\n

      <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/span><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

     It would
\n      have been possible to determine whether a Galactic gravity wave
\n      had indeed immediately preceded the December 26th earthquake
\n      by examining data from gravity wave telescopes.  Since seismic
\n      waves from the Indonesian earthquake would have taken some time
\n      to propagate through the Earth to these gravity wave antenna,
\n      their signature could be distinguished from the gravity wave
\n      coming from SGR 1806-20.  However, the major gravity wave
\n      telescopes were unfortunately not on line at that time.   LIGO<\/a> (Laser
\n      Interferometer Gravity Wave Observatory), which consists of two
\n      correlated telescopes, one in Washington state and one in Louisiana,
\n      each having a four kilometer long laser interferometer beam path,
\n      was in the process of being made operational and unfortunately
\n      was not collecting data at that time.   We sent an
\n      email to the staff of the TAMA gravity wave antenna in Japan.
\n       Dr. Takahashi, who is responsible for the detector, replied
\n      that their telescope was unfortunately not operating during that
\n      week since they were making modifications at that time.  So
\n      at present the gravity wave hypothesis remains neither confirmed
\n      nor disproven.<\/span><\/p>\n

      

<\/p>\n
\n

<\/span><\/center>
\n      

<\/p>\n\n        <\/p>\n\n\n          <\/p>\n
\n            
 <\/span>Superwave Monitoring Center<\/span><\/strong><\/center>
\n            <\/p>\n

   Those interested in
\n            monitoring earthquake, gamma ray burst, cosmic ray background
\n            activity, and gravity wave bursts may try the following websites:<\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Current earthquakes: http:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/recenteqsww\/Quakes\/quakes_all.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Past earthquakes:  http:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/activity\/past.html<\/a>past.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Gamma ray bursts:  http:\/\/grad40.as.utexas.edu\/grblog.php?author=D.%20Gotz<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Cosmic ray radiation intensity:  http:\/\/cr0.izmiran.rssi.ru\/mosc\/main.htm<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

\u2022<\/span><\/strong> Gravity wave bursts
\n             (LIGO site:  no posted data, just posted papers): 
\n            http:\/\/www.ligo.caltech.edu\/<\/a>
\n             and  http:\/\/www.ligo.org\/results\/<\/p>\n

            <\/a> <\/span>\u2022<\/span> <\/span><\/strong>Listing of various relevant events: http:\/\/www.earthchangestv.com<\/a><\/span>
\n          <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        <\/tr>\n

      <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center>
\n      

<\/p>\n
\n

<\/span><\/center>
\n      <\/p>\n

The December 27th GRB was not accompanied
\n      by any rise in the cosmic ray background, indicating that if
\n      it was accompanied by cosmic rays their intensity was unable
\n      to exceed the relatively constant extragalactic background flux
\n      arriving from distant galaxies.  A Galactic superwave, on
\n      the other hand, would most likely produce a substantial rise
\n      in these levels.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

   Note that almost two
\n      months passed before the December 27th gamma ray burst found
\n      its way into news media stories.  If unusually intense activity
\n      were to occur in the near future as the beginning stages of a
\n      superwave arrival, it is hoped that scientists will not keep
\n      this knowledge to themselves but rather allow the global news
\n      media to disseminate the story quickly to inform the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

      <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

      

<\/p>\n\n        <\/p>\n\n\n          <\/p>\n
\n            
A Superluminal Gravity Wave?<\/span><\/strong><\/center>
\n            <\/p>\n

Experiments carried out by Eugene Podkletnov<\/a>
\n            show that a shock front outburst produces a longitudinal gravitational
\n            wave that travels forward with the burst.  He has found
\n            that this gravity wave pulse has a speed in excess of 64 times
\n            the speed of light (personal communication).  Also Guy Obolensky
\n            has produced spark discharge electric potential shock fronts
\n            and observed them to propagate forward at speeds as high as 10
\n            times the speed of light.  Observations suggest that the
\n            gravity wave from an expanding stellar explosion will decrease
\n            its superluminal speed and eventually approach the speed of light
\n            as the shock front expands.  But meanwhile, the gravity
\n            wave will have obtained a headstart over the electromagnetic
\n            wave radiation component traveling in its wake (light waves,
\n            gamma rays, etc.).  So one would expect that the gravity
\n            wave from such an outburst (and its resultant earthquake activity)
\n            would precede the gamma ray burst component.<\/span>
\n          <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        <\/tr>\n

      <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center>
\n      

<\/p>\n\n        <\/p>\n\n\n          <\/p>\n
\n            
Others Coming to the Same
\n            Conclusion<\/span><\/strong><\/center>
\n            <\/p>\n

Dr. LaViolette posted the above
\n            page on February 20, 2005 having learned about the December 2004
\n            gamma ray burst on the day before and at that time realized that
\n            it must have been associated with the Malaysian tsunami.  On
\n            February 21st Lazarus Long also posted a similar idea on a news
\n            group.<\/span><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

Lazarus Long
\n            Posted: Feb 21 2005-21:23<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

I just thought I should put this on this thread for the record.<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

A very interesting event occurred almost simultaneously with
\n            the Tsunami event but it appears few have noticed but this gamma
\n            ray burst almost coincided with the tectonic event (it was slightly
\n            afterward) here on Earth. I am curious if what we witnessed was
\n            a gravitational bow wave effect that preceded the actual gamma
\n            radiation as a shock-wave. Just coincidence?<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

Could be but….<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

Remember the distance traveled was 50,000 lt yrs. This could
\n            be evidence to verify the critical aspects of quantum gravitational
\n            theory as a mountain of data was collected. My suspicion is that
\n            a type of Huygens Gravitational Wave effect may have preceded
\n            the actual EM *flash* by many hours or it might simply reflect
\n            the period of compression and gravitational displacement within
\n            the Neutron Stars’ power surge that preceded the actual EM emission.<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

Apparently the entire solar system was shaking from the event,
\n            in fact the entire galaxy is apparently experiencing a kind of
\n            gravitational oscillation (vibration) as this wave propagates.
\n            What if we are seeing an event that can be quantified to be slightly
\n            faster than light and being propagated just ahead of it?<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

While the flash was noticed after the tectonic event locally
\n            it is entirely conceivable that the actual gravitation shock
\n            wave struck earlier and while no one to date has related the
\n            two events I am curious if we may also be seeing evidence of
\n            how cosmic scale events could interfere with planetary tectonics
\n            by introducing a trigger force sufficient to release the pent
\n            up energy that already exists internally within the planet.<\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n

I am curious if the relationship of gravity and the event
\n            can be measured precisely in relation to the actual EM radiation
\n            emitted that we may have sufficient data and measures to test
\n            quantum gravitational theory against, which are analogous to
\n            how the Michaelson Morley experiment was used to verify Relativity
\n            Theory.
\n          <\/p>\n<\/td>\n

        <\/tr>\n

      <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center>
\n      

 <\/center>
\n      
Click here
\n      for a list of books by Paul LaViolette<\/span><\/a><\/center>
\n      
Click
\n      here for downloadable papers by Paul LaViolette<\/span><\/a><\/center>
\n    <\/td>\n

  <\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}