<\/p>\n
Growing
\nMedia Interest in UFOs – Is Partial Official Disclosure of UFOs as Classified
\nAntigravity Vehicles Inevitable? <\/p>\n
There has been much recent media interest I know James Fox and Leslie Kean mean well and believe We mustn’t forget that credible whistleblowers have revealed the existence Excluding the extraterrestrial hypothesis and focusing exclusively We might need We need <\/p>\n Michael E. Salla, Ph.D ***<\/p>\n
\nin UFO sightings. In particular, there have been a series of interviews conducted
\non Larry King Live, the
\nNovember 12, 2007, National Press Club conference<\/a>, and the Presidential debate
\nconcerning UFOs sparked by Shirley
\nMacLaine’s revelation<\/a> of Dennis Kucinich’s sightings. This has done much to
\nraise public awareness of UFO’s. There have been those in the exopolitical movement
\narguing that in the interest of being "media savvy", the extraterrestrial
\nelement needs to be downplayed. For example, in January
\n24, 2008 Larry King Live <\/a>show following up on the Stephenville Texas, UFO
\nsightings, James Fox explicitly excluded discussion of the extraterrestrial issue
\nand just focused on the UFO sightings themselves as "unexplained" phenomena.
\nThis replicated what happened at the November
\nNational Press Club conference<\/a> that was organized by James Fox and Leslie
\nKean. The emphasis was on UFO sightings and the extraterrestrial hypothesis was
\nnot raised at all. That is a very dangerous strategy since it opens the door to
\nthe national security explanation that Michael Shermer discussed on the most recent
\nLarry King show that UFOs may be classified craft that are only disclosed on a
\nneed to know basis.<\/p>\n
\nthat by focusing on the unknown aspect of UFO sightings that the right doors will
\nopen. However, they are now actively playing a gatekeeper role in how to best
\napproach the UFO issue with regard to the mainstream media. They are being cultivated
\nas regular guests and authorities on UFOs. It would be a shame if they continue
\nto exclude discussion of the extraterrestrial hypothesis on the misplaced grounds
\nthat that is strategically the best way to deal with skeptics, get mainstream
\nmedia interest, and gain public support for Congressional inquiries, etc. The
\nCIA has used the national security
\nargument in the past to dismiss the extraterrestrial hypothesis<\/a> that UFOs
\nare interplanetary in origin (which they claim was exploited as a cover to genuine
\nclassified projects), and will do so again to explain away the extraterrestrial
\nhypothesis. Congress plays no significant oversight role when it comes to Waived
\nSpecial Access Programs so what would a Congressional inquiry achieve if the US
\nAir Force claimed that the sightings involved classified projects that are Waived
\nSAPs?<\/p>\n
\nof antigravity craft such as the TR-3B<\/a> that is approximately 600 feet wide,
\nand can replicate the speeds and right angle turns of many UFO sightings. Also,
\nBen Rich, former Lockheed Martin CEO, said: "We
\nnow have the technology to take ET home."<\/a> That suggests that classified
\ncraft now exist that can replicate the performance of extraterrestrial vehicles
\nprobably due to reverse engineering as Col. Corso explained in his testimony and
\nbook.<\/p>\n
\non the UFO sightings themselves may ultimately serve to perpetuate non-disclosure
\nof extraterrestrial life for several more years. I can easily see how the TR-3B
\ncan one day be unveiled to the world media, and U.S. Government authorities claim
\nthat it has been around for decades, was highly classified, and was what people
\nwere mistaking for UFOs for decades. The Air Force or CIA could claim that they
\nactually cultivated the UFO issue to hide the truth of these very classified projects.
\nHence, it would be claimed that the UFO problem has been solved, and the idea
\nof extraterrestrial life is still just the conjecture of conspiracy theorists.
\nJames Fox and Leslie Kean current strategy may be opening the door to such a scenario.
\nIn short, it’s a very dangerous strategy to exclude discussion of the extraterrestrial
\nhypothesis given the likelihood that classified antigravity vehicles have been
\ndeveloped and will be eventually unveiled to the public and used to explain away
\ndecades of UFO reports. Then skeptics like Michael Shermer will claim that they
\nwere correct all along and that ‘unidentifieds’ were highly classified government
\naircraft not disclosed to the public for several decades.<\/p>\n
\nto accept that we are probably in the midst of a well developed disclosure plan
\nwith a clear sequence of orchestrated events, and that the Larry King Live show
\nis part of the process. The plan likely will take advantage of the recent Stephenville
\nUFO sightings<\/a> and other UFO sightings so as to promote a disclosure scenario
\nwhere UFOs are explained away as highly advanced classified antigravity technology.
\nIndeed, we might consider such a scenario as inevitable, coming before a more
\ngenuine disclosure of extraterrestrial life, since it will do much to allay public
\nconcerns over extraterrestrial motivations and technology. After all, the government
\ncan say that we have our own fleet of advanced antigravity craft that can replicate
\nthe performance of UFOs, so no cause for concern if extraterrestrial life is found
\nto exist. I believe it inevitable that genuine disclosure will be preceded by
\na limited disclosure based on the idea that UFOs are classified antigravity projects.
\nThe secret planners may want to sow this idea into the mass consciousness for
\na few years or more before going ahead with genuine disclosure of extraterrestrial
\nlife. So eliminating the extraterrestrial hypothesis while discussing unexplained
\nsightings plays into the hands of the shadow government planners. <\/p>\n
\nto be a little more sophisticated and not play into the hands of such shadow government
\nplans. Ed Komarek’s latest article, "Exopolitics:
\nDo We Collaborate<\/a>," nicely introduces the dilemma faced by the UFO and
\nexopolitical communities using the metaphor of occupied Europe in WWII when it
\ncomes to the reality of extraterrestrial life. The temptation to dampen down discussion
\nof extraterrestrial life in order to get mainstream media support of UFO sightings
\nis very real, and is currently occurring. This must be avoided. Otherwise, one
\nmay facilitate a partial disclosure of UFOs as classified antigravity vehicles
\nthat may delay genuine disclosure of extraterrestrial life for years to come.\n<\/p>\n
Kona, Hawaii
1\/30\/08
\nwww.Exopolitics.Org<\/a> <\/p>\n