{"id":494,"date":"2012-02-16T17:59:38","date_gmt":"2012-02-16T17:59:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/2012\/02\/16\/four-us-exotic-black-ops-used-in-911-tesla-time-travel-antigravity-ufo-directed-energy-weapons-mini\/"},"modified":"2012-02-16T17:59:38","modified_gmt":"2012-02-16T17:59:38","slug":"four-us-exotic-black-ops-used-in-911-tesla-time-travel-antigravity-ufo-directed-energy-weapons-mini","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/four-us-exotic-black-ops-used-in-911-tesla-time-travel-antigravity-ufo-directed-energy-weapons-mini\/","title":{"rendered":"Four U.S. exotic black ops used in 9\/11:  Tesla time travel, antigravity UFO, directed energy weapons, mini-nukes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd<\/p>\n<p><em>This article is part of an  ongoing series on U.S.  black budget exotic technologies,  their use in the 9\/11 false flag  psyops, and the consequent impact on  humanity\u2019s social and exopolitical  future.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>New <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=eFIGeINof0Y&amp;NR=1\" target=\"_blank\">computer  analysis<\/a> by UK researcher Richard D. Hall has revealed that an  anti-gravity  remote controlled UFO drone may have been used to hit World  Trade  Center tower 2 on September 11, 2001.&#0160; Mr. Hall made this  analysis  public in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=WfEpXAYwVIo&amp;feature=related\" target=\"_blank\">two  videos<\/a> set out in the Examiner.com article below.<\/p>\n<p>Mr.  Hall\u2019s analysis of a possible an anti-gravity remote controlled  UFO  drone used to hit the World Trade Center on 9\/11 is the subject of  an  exclusive <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ga53vcjfRX0\" target=\"_blank\">ExopoliticsTV  interview by Alfred Lambremont Webre<\/a> with UFO, reverse speech and  video analysis expert <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-48237-Vancouver-UFO-Examiner\" target=\"_blank\">Jon  Kelly (Vancouver UFO Examiner)<\/a>, available for viewing by  Examiner.com in the article below.&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>According to Mr. Hall\u2019s  analysis, a remote-controlled anti-gravity  UFO, clearly visible in video  footage, was intentionally guided into  World Trade Center tower 2 on  9\/11.&#0160; News and other video footage  showing images of a jetliner hitting  WTC tower 2 is due, according to  Mr. Hall\u2019s analysis, to after the fact  editing. Another  remote-controlled antigravity UFO, according to Mr.  Hall was most  probably guided into World Trade Center Tower 1.<\/p>\n<p>Project  Camelot whistleblower <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=AoB18unO7iA&amp;feature=player_embedded\" target=\"_blank\">Aaron  McCollum<\/a> has also revealed in that U.S. secret antigravity craft  that he  traveled in possessed a stealth camouflage capability to appear  and  sound like a commercial jetliner, such as a Boeing 747.<\/p>\n<p>Jon  Kelly\u2019s analysis of the 9\/11 antigravity UFO, which identifies  the  September 11, 2001 false flag operation as \u201ca showcase for exotic   military technologies including black project UFO&#39;s\u201d is set out in the   ExopoliticsTV interview video below.<\/p>\n<p>A total of four advanced  exotic technologies exclusively in the  possession of U.S. black budget  military intelligence have now been  inked to use in the 9\/11 false flag  psychological operation by an  executive command and control network that  reaches to the highest  levels of U.S. government,  military-intelligence, and world political  and financial elites.<\/p>\n<p>Examiner.com reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre has identified these   four U.S. black budget exotic technologies as key to identifying,   planning and\/or carrying out the 9\/11 false flag psyops:<\/p>\n<p>(1)  9\/11 remote controlled antigravity UFO (Richard D. Hall, researcher;  Project Camelot whistleblower Aaron McCollum);<\/p>\n<p>(2) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d16-Secret-time-travel-planning-HAARP-weapons-key-to-30year-operations-plan-behind-false-flag-of-911\" target=\"_blank\">Quantum  access Tesla-based time travel teleportation<\/a> to access images of  9\/11 in 1971 (Andrew D. Basiago, DARPA Project Pegasus whistleblower);<\/p>\n<p>(3)<a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d23-Scientist--Directed-energy-weapons-turned-World-Trade-Center-into-nanoparticles-on-911\" target=\"_blank\"> Directed Energy weapon<\/a> (possibly although not necessarily HAARP)  for controlled demolition of  World Trade Center towers by molecular  dissociation (Researchers Dr.  Judy Wood and another independent  scientist)<\/p>\n<p>(4) <a href=\"http:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/peaceinspace\/2009\/12\/coopradioorg-haarp-its-role-in-the-false-flag-operation-of-september-11-2001-with-independent-scientist-leuren-moret.html\" target=\"_blank\">4th  Generation mini-nuke<\/a> for controlled demolition of World Trade  Center towers (Independent scientist).<\/p>\n<p>The principal barriers  to use of this <em>prima facie<\/em> eyewitness, whistleblower and  documentary evidence in criminal  prosecution of the perpetrators of the  false flag operation of  September 11, 2001 are (1) A U.S. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ga53vcjfRX0\" target=\"_blank\">government  truth embargo<\/a> around these black budget technologies; (2) An active  campaign by agencies such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/video.google.com\/videoplay?docid=7877765982288566190#\" target=\"_blank\">National  Security Agency (NSA)<\/a> to disrupt the 9\/11 truth movement, and any  prosecution of the true  high level perpetrators of the 9\/11 false flag  operation, such as  former U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice President  Richard B. Cheney,  and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld; and (3) a  denial paradigm  within the<a href=\"http:\/\/911blogger.com\/news\/2010-05-03\/examinercom-911-articles-alfred-lambremont-webre-jd-med-new-avenues-research\" target=\"_blank\"> 9\/11 truth movement<\/a>,  the mainstream media, the international  justice system, and a  significant constituency of the public that these  exotic technologies  exist and may have been used by high-ranking  officials and individuals  in the commission of the 9\/11 false flag  operation.<\/p>\n<p>The false flag operation of September 11, 2001  provided a <a href=\"http:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/911\/2009\/12\/googlevideo-why-we-need-a-911-war-crimes-tribunal-by-alfred-lambremont-webre-jd-med.html\" target=\"_blank\">legislative,  political and media pretex<\/a>t for the launching of a worldwide war on  terror by the U.S. and \u2018allies,\u2019 and a domestic police state worldwide.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9\/11 remote-controlled antigravity UFO<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>ExopoliticsTV  interview<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Examiner.com readers can view UFO and  video analysis expert Jon Kelly\u2019s exclusive interview on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ga53vcjfRX0\" target=\"_blank\">ExopoliticsTV<\/a> with Alfred Lambremont Webre, in a 2-part video starting below:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"199\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ga53vcjfRX0\" width=\"333\"><\/iframe>&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>In his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ga53vcjfRX0\" target=\"_blank\">ExopoliticsTV  interview<\/a>,  Jon Kelly states, \u201c9-11 as a showcase for exotic military  technologies  including black project UFO&#39;s. Why use a UFO to deliver an  explosives  payload? The UFO is destroyed in the delivery process. Is  that a sign  of advanced technologies, when your delivery vehicle is  destroyed on  the first delivery? Why use a UFO, then cover it up with  video editing  only to have it uncovered nine years later? Why not a  missile or a  bomb?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Kelly continues, \u201cBy destroying the  delivery vehicle in the  process of delivering an explosives payload to  the WTC towers, one can  reduce the opportunity for witnesses to make  sense out of the attacks.  According to Richard Hall&#39;s presentation,  covering up the real events  with video manipulation was important to the  controllers behind the  scenes of 9-11.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>ExopoliticsTV  Interview &#8211; Part 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Part 2 of UFO and video analysis  expert Jon Kelly\u2019s exclusive  interview on ExopoliticsTV with Alfred  Lambremont Webre starts below:<\/p>\n<p>&#0160;<iframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"199\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ZKAw9TDqcwI\" width=\"333\"><\/iframe>&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Kelly states, \u201cThe  strategic model is not unlike a VBIED or a  truck bomb, where a truck  filled with explosives drives to the target  then detonates.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr.  Kelly concludes, \u201cIn Richard Hall&#39;s version of events, a VBIED  in the  form of an exploding UFO strikes the WTC. Mr. Hall clearly  demonstrates  that the raw video of this event was edited using masks  and layers to  produce a fictional visual account of the events of 9-11  for  distribution as news by the major media. The raw video, sourced  from a  VHS recording is not a high resolution recording. However, it  does  convincingly display a metallic, reflective saucer-shaped vehicle  in a  steady, controlled descent into the WTC tower.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ga53vcjfRX0\" target=\"_blank\">ExopoliticsTV  interview<\/a>,  Jon Kelly states, \u201cMr. Hall\u2019s hypothesis also resolves  long-standing  questions regarding the pod-shaped object protruding from  the bottom of  the jet airliner as it crashes into the tower. Mr. Hall  describes the  pod as the remnants of the UFO saucer mixed with the  overlayed jet  airliner video image. The overlay did not subtract the  saucer from the  frame, but combined it visually with the airliner.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Kelly concludes, \u201cIf this very expensive technology was  deployed  for this purpose, it represents extreme hubris and arrogance on  the  part of the deployers. Why did they need to do that? To show off to   themselves? To show off to someone else? As an ultimate act of   perversion? They perverted the flow of tax dollars from the average   citizens to develop secret technologies which they then used to secretly   seize control of society and launch illegal wars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>9\/11:  Showcase for exotic military-intelligence technologies<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>9\/11  as a multi-dimensional false flag psyops appears to have been  designed  as a showcase for the leading edge of U.S. black budget   military-intelligence technologies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Quantum access  Tesla-based time travel<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The first among these exotic  technologies was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d16-Secret-time-travel-planning-HAARP-weapons-key-to-30year-operations-plan-behind-false-flag-of-911\" target=\"_blank\">quantum  access Tesla-based time travel technology<\/a>,  developed in DARPA\u2019s  Project Pegasus (1968-72) under the policy  oversight of then Nixon  cabinet member Donald H. Rumsfeld.&#0160; Mr.  Rumsfeld was later to play a  pivotal operational role in the 9\/11 false  flag as U.S. Secretary of  Defense on September 11, 2001.<\/p>\n<p>A key whistle blower, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.projectpegasus.net\/andrew_d_basiago\" target=\"_blank\">Andrew   D. Basiago,<\/a> , has emerged with evidence  that secret U.S. time travel  technologies  were used as early as 1971 to  acquire first-hand  documentary  knowledge about September 11, 2001 \u2013  fully three decades  before the  horrific events of that fateful day.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Basiago, a child participant in DARPA\u2019s time travel program,   Project Pegasus, has publicly stated how in 1971 he viewed moving   images of the attack on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 that had   been obtained from the future and brought back to the early 1970\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.darpa.mil\/\" target=\"_blank\">DARPA<\/a> is the   chief  research and development arm of the US military, the Defense   Advanced  Research Projects Agency.&#0160; DARPA created the precursor to the   Internet,  \u201cArpanet,\u201d and has a penchant for trumpeting its advances,   such as  putting surveillance cameras on the backs of bumblebees and   other exotic  achievements in military science.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Basiago  claims that DARPA\u2019s  secret technical accomplishments go  far beyond what  it has publicly  acknowledged and that by 1970 DARPA  had achieved  teleportation-based <a href=\"http:\/\/www.projectpegasus.net\/\" target=\"_blank\">time  travel<\/a> as  well as advanced electro-optical means of discerning past  and  future  events via different technologies that provide quantum  access.&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>Mr.  Basiago has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.projectmars.net\/media_radio\" target=\"_blank\">described<\/a> how while serving in Project Pegasus, he  viewed moving images of 9\/11   at the secured U.S. defense-technical  facility where they were   processed after being retrieved from the  future, the Aerojet   Corporation facility that once stood at the corner  of Bullock Avenue   and Leroy Place in Socorro, New Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>According  to Mr.  Basiago\u2019s whistleblower testimony, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Donald_Rumsfeld\" target=\"_blank\">Donald  H. Rumsfeld<\/a>,  the sitting U.S. Secretary of  Defense on September 11,  2001, was the  defense attach\u00e9 to Project  Pegasus during the early  1970\u2019s, when Mr.  Rumsfeld was officially  serving as a counselor to  President Nixon and  member of his Board of  Wage and Price Stabilization.<\/p>\n<p>In all likelihood, Mr.  Rumsfeld, as the defense attach\u00e9 to Project  Pegasus, would have known  about and possibly had control over the data  about 9\/11 derived via  \u201cquantum access\u201d and brought back to the early  1970\u2019s for analysis by  the DARPA research and development program under  his administrative  authority.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Basiago\u2019s eyewitness account  that Secretary  Rumsfeld and others  knew about 9\/11 decades in advance  because data  about it was gathered  via DARPA\u2019s secret time travel  program unlocks  several of the more  enigmatic facts in the 9\/11  literature and may be  the key to society\u2019s  unraveling of the ultimate  accountability for the  false flag  operation that took place on September  11, 2001.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d16-Secret-time-travel-planning-HAARP-weapons-key-to-30year-operations-plan-behind-false-flag-of-911%3Cbr%20\/%3E\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Andrew D. Basiago answers questions about Project Pegasus  and 9\/11<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Q: Why would the US take part in 9\/11?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: What I know is that in the early 1970&#39;s,  Project  Pegasus had moving images of one of the planes hitting one of  the Twin  Towers on 9\/11; that 9\/11 was known and spoken of by project   principals; and that the defense attach\u00e9 to Project Pegasus was Donald   Rumsfeld, the individual who was serving as Defense Secretary during   9\/11. The evidence from Project Pegasus shows that the US government   knew about the 9\/11 attacks many years in advance, not necessarily that   it &quot;took part&quot; in those attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Q: If Project Pegasus knew  about 9\/11 before it would happen, why wasn&#39;t 9\/11 prevented from  occurring?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: That&#39;s a good question. What I  know is that it  was the consensus of the US officials administering  Project Pegasus  that information about future events should be used to  engage in  contingency planning for future events but not to &quot;play God&quot;  and change  the future by preventing or altering future events. A paradox  exists  such that acting to change future events based on prior  knowledge of  them results in diminished accurate knowledge of future  events. So,  there is an institutional reluctance to change future events  based upon  prior knowledge of them because of the impact of doing so on  the  quality of the intelligence database concerning future events.<\/p>\n<p>Q: How much information about the future has Project Pegasus  learned about?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: My experiences in Project  Pegasus indicate that  by 1970, the US government was using chronovision  to capture remotely  and record on film a vast amount of footage of past  and future events.  When we visited the project location at Flemington,  NJ &#8212; where I was  shown remote images of the signing of the US  Constitution in 1787 and  saw George Washington and Benjamin Franklin as  they appeared in life &#8212;  we could see that the technicians there were  filming reams and reams  of scenes of past events on 16 mm film stock and  storing it in film  canisters. Presumably, this process is done  digitally today.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Is Project Pegasus still active?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew  D. Basiago: I do not know whether Project Pegasus is still  active, but  the intelligence infrastructure that evolved from it is in  all  likelihood very active at this time. Project Pegasus was a small,  highly  secret research and development program launched in the late  1960&#39;s.  However, the technologies that it developed gave the US  government the  keys to past and future events. My guess is that the  quantum access  capabilities that Project Pegasus provided the US  government are now  headquartered at some form of national intelligence  center that provides  the President, the intelligence community and the  military information  about future events.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Was just the military involved or was  the government also involved?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: Project  Pegasus combined individuals employed by  the US military (Navy, DARPA),  the US intelligence community (CIA) and  civilian defense contractors  (e.g., Parsons). It was a research and  development program of the US  Department of Defense (DoD).<\/p>\n<p>Q: How could a father actually  put his son through all of these violent and possibly fatal  transportation experiments?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: It is my  position that my father and I were proud  to serve our country during its  hour of maximum danger and were also  privileged to be involved in  America&#39;s early activities in time-space  exploration. My father did not  involve me in Project Pegasus. Rather,  we were approached by the US  government and told we had to be involved  for reasons that remain a  mystery. In all likelihood, we were  identified by project personnel from  the future, who knew from the  perspective of their time that we had  been involved in the program, and  hence we were brought into the program  to create the future program  that had knowledge of our past  involvement.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Why was not an adult the one transported so  that the information brought back might be more precise?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew  D. Basiago: Children were involved for five main reasons.  First, we  were experimental test subjects into the physical and mental  effects of  teleportation on children. Second, we were necessary  participants  because the holograms produced by the chronovisors would  collapse if  adults were involved and so small, cooperative, intelligent  human beings  were needed as the time travelers in the chronovisor  probes, and  therefore a decision was made to involve gifted and  talented American  school children. Third, we were regarded as better  participant-observers  of the past and future events accessed in the  program because children  are tabula rasa &#8212; blank slates whose  perceptions are not skewed by the  selection bias produced by their  previous experiences. Fourth, we were  trainees who were expected to  become America&#39;s first generation of  &quot;chrononauts&quot; in a fully fledged  time-space program when we grew up.  Fifth and lastly, the Department of  Defense found that when adults were  involved in time travel, the  psychologically destabilizing effects of  moving between alternate time  lines was causing some adult time  travelers to become insane, so it was  hoped that by training time  travelers from childhood a competent cadre  of US time travelers could be  formed.<\/p>\n<p>Q: How could a child possibly be put through all of  this and also  remember everything he saw or even understand what he saw  or heard?<\/p>\n<p>Andrew D. Basiago: I am a gifted individual with  exceptional powers  of observation and memory. These gifts were  identified when I was being  trained in Project Pegasus. In one test, I  recited back random numbers  provided to me verbally to 84 places. I was  identified as the future  whistle blower about Project Pegasus even while  I was still serving on  the project. I have spent over 10 years  investigating my experiences  and proving them to an historical  certainty. I am an individual who did  remember what I saw and heard, so  it is not valid to say that I  couldn&#39;t have done so because a child  couldn&#39;t or shouldn&#39;t have been  able to. That involves the fallacy of  using the general to refute the  specific. I not only remembered much of  what I saw and heard, but I  later wrote it down and went back and  investigated it and proved my  memories. Consequently, I am now able to  provide an insider&#39;s account  of the US government&#39;s time-space program  at the time of its emergence  in the late 1960&#39;s and early 1970&#39;s.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Andrew D. Basiago&#39;s Comments on ExopoliticsTV 9\/11 Antigravity UFO<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On August 13, 2010, Mr. Basiago wrote to the producers and guest of ExopoliticsTV,<\/p>\n<p><em>Alfred, Jon,<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In re:&#0160; Exopolitics TV<\/p>\n<p>The complexities of what I have described in regard to Project  Pegasus are being distorted just as I feared they would be in the 9\/11  context, which is why I avoided talking about the 9\/11 connection to  Project Pegasus for so many years.<\/p>\n<p>Let me explain:<\/p>\n<p>The images of 9\/11 that I saw at the Aerojet Corporation  facility in Socorro, NM were from the microfilmed summaries of future  events that we were traveling to the future (2045) via stargate to  retrieve and bring back.<\/p>\n<p>The lab at Aerojet was not a chronovisor array; it was a microfilm-processing lab.<\/p>\n<p>What my father and I were being shown was footage from the  future that had survived the journey backward in time intact enough to  be developed at Aerojet and provide a video window into what would  happen on the fated day in the future known as 9\/11.<\/p>\n<p>The images were NOT real time images retrieved in 1971 from 2001, which presumably would have shown the saucer.<\/p>\n<p>So, I want to make it clear that my account of seeing planes in  those images and Hall&#39;s account of a saucer around which a hologram of a  plane was wrapped or later inserted are NOT inconsistent.<\/p>\n<p>We were seeing the conventional, post-9\/11 images that showed a  plane, with the additional element that the images had been ferried back  from a repository in the future.<\/p>\n<p>We were not peering into the actual event, for which Halls&#39; data  now suggests we would have seen a flying saucer rather than the second  plane.<\/p>\n<p>We were seeing images from the future of the conventional, 9\/11 cover story featuring the planes.<\/p>\n<p>To my knowledge, there wasn&#39;t a chronovisor array in Socorro.<\/p>\n<p>What I saw and later investigated was that an Aerojet facility  falsely described as Gibbons Hall, a student union of New Mexico Tech,  was being used by Aerojet and the physics faculty of New Mexico Tech to  retrieve portions of the microfilm that had not be erased when it was  jumped<br \/> back in time via stargate to the present.<\/p>\n<p>This microfilm contained summaries of future events being prepared by project historians in the<br \/> future.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the images of the planes hitting the towers did not result  from Looking Glass technology but rather historical archives that were  accessed to produce the briefing materials contained on the microfilm  that were being sent back from the future to our present to brief the  Nixon Administration on the history of the future.<\/p>\n<p>I just wanted to clear this up because your broadcast on  Exopolitics TV seemed to imply that Hall&#39;s footage refutes my claims  about the 9\/11 footage&#0160; and it does NOT have this evidentiary impact.<\/p>\n<p>Andy<\/p>\n<p><strong>Scientist: Directed energy weapons turned World Trade  Center into nanoparticles on 9\/11<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Evidentiary  sample: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d23-Scientist--Directed-energy-weapons-turned-World-Trade-Center-into-nanoparticles-on-911\" target=\"_blank\">directed  energy weapons &amp; WTC buildings<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>One <a href=\"http:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/peaceinspace\/2009\/12\/coopradioorg-haarp-its-role-in-the-false-flag-operation-of-september-11-2001-with-independent-scientist-leuren-moret.html\" target=\"_blank\">researcher<\/a> draws on Dr. Wood\u2019s work and sets out a   sample of documentary and  witness evidence sufficient to conclude that   an advanced directed  energy weapon was used on the World Trade Center   (WTC) buildings on  9\/11.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9\/11 documentary evidence of  use  of directed energy weapons at WTC<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1.&#0160; <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Seismic  Record<\/span>:  \u201cThe energy budget recorded in the  seismic record on the  day of 9\/11  and the collapse of the WTC  buildings did not reflect the  mass of  building materials involved in  the collapse, nor the nearly  freefall of  the collapsing buildings. The  seismic record demonstrates  an event on  the scale of a quarry blast.  Where was the thud [that would  have  accompanied a WTC building  collapse]?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>2.&#0160; <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Kinetic  Energy<\/span>:  \u201cTwo robust WTC buildings with very  robust steel beam  reinforcement  would release a sizeable amount of  kinetic energy from  the buildings  falling \u2013 that would be all of the  energy that went into  the  construction of the WTC buildings. The  release of that amount of  kinetic  energy is not reflected in the  physical evidence on the seismic  record.  Into what physical process  did that kinetic energy go?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>3.&#0160; <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Molecular  Dissociation<\/span>: \u201cThe collapse of the WTC   buildings produced the  highest mass per volume of very fine particles   (nanoparticles) ever  measured in an air sample in the United States.&#0160;   It takes a tremendous  amount of energy to dissociate or break the   molecular bonds of steel,  concrete and other building materials that   were \u201cpowdered\u201d into very  fine particles during the collapse of the   buildings. The largest mass  per volume of metals ever measured in an   air sample in the US were  reported by Dr. Thomas Cahill who did air   monitoring for 5 months. Metal  is used in buildings because it is very   strong \u2013 and would require  large amounts of energy to reduce it to   nanoparticles. Chemical  explosives do not release enough energy to   produce that volume of very  fine particles.&#0160; A much more energetic   process was involved such as  laser or beam energy which releases   focused and concentrated energy as  complex waveforms necessary to cause   molecular dissociation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>4.&#0160;  <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Physical Evidence of  Buildings Collapsing<\/span>: \u201cIn videos of  the  collapses on 9\/11 the WTC  buildings erupted into emulsion like a   drinking fountain, and the  rubble did not hit the ground.&#0160; Even on  tape  huge pieces of aluminum  building siding vaporized as they were   freefalling, and never hit the  ground.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>5.&#0160; <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Controlled  Demolition<\/span>: \u201cThe [collapse of  the WTC buildings] was <strong>not<\/strong> a &#39;controlled demolition&#39;  for the following reasons:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">WTC  Detritus Pile<\/span> -&#0160;  \u201cShould have been 1\/3 the height of the  WTC  buildings.&#0160; The 100+ story  WTC buildings were about 1 story high  when  the collapse of the  buildings ended. A fireman on one of the news  videos  said the antenna  that had been on the top of WTC Building 1  was on the  top of a pile of  rubble about one story high. The rubble  pile should  have been 35  stories if it was a conventional controlled  demolition.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">WTC  Rubble Never Hit the Ground<\/span> \u2013 \u201cThis defies gravity, where  did the  rubble go?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Footprints<\/span> \u2013 \u201cGeometrically Round  Holes:  contiguous round  holes 24\u2019 in diameter were in the footprints of  the  WTC buildings 1  and 2, and a 60\u2019 deep geometrically round hole was  in  the middle of  Liberty Street near the WTC. This is evidence of beam   weapons. There  was no debris inside the footprints of the two WTC   buildings, only  bare dirt with circles in the dirt.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Dust<\/span> -&#0160; \u201cIn videos of the collapse larger particles fell and  cascaded down   from the buildings under the forces of gravity, but  before they hit the   ground they vaporized and suddenly went up into  the atmosphere like an   antigravity demonstration.&#0160; Nanoparticles are  so tiny that they are  not  subject to the forces of gravity, so  molecular dissociation  occurred on  the larger particles as they were  freefalling, reducing  them into  nano-particles (0.1 microns in  diameter and smaller) that  suddenly  obeyed other physical laws of  quantum mechanics.&#0160; More  evidence of  [directed energy weapon or]  HAARP\/beam weapon technology  applied during  collapse.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">9\/11 Satellite photos<\/span> &#8211;  \u201c[9\/11 satellite  photographs showed]  dust going into upper atmosphere  \u2013which had to be  nanoparticles and  may have been enhanced by other  technology because  most very fine  particles\/dust would stay in the  Troposphere and be  rained out in 2  months as we know from depleted  uranium particulate  releases from  battlefield already.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">1400  Toasted Cars<\/span> &#8211;  \u201cLocated blocks from the WTC buildings,  with door  handles missing,  engine blocks missing, blistering on some  parts of the  car finish,  strange rust patterns on the bodies of the  cars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Paper  Around  Cars Not Burned<\/span> &#8211; &quot;Whatever \u2018vaporized\u2019 the  engine blocks  and the  door handles on 1400 cars did not ignite fragile  and flammable  paper  lying all over the ground around the cars. If  engine blocks and  door  handles selectively vaporized, why didn\u2019t body  of car vaporize?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Pile  of Cars Spontaneously Combusted<\/span> &#8211; \u201cIn a news video,  the  entire pile  of cars started burning spontaneously at the same time   with no visible  cause, it was not a fire that started in one car and   spread to others.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Rust Occurred Immediately<\/span> &#8211; \u201cOn  cars and trucks, and in FEMA   photos there was heavy rust on steel beams  \u2013 steel does not rust, and  it  is a slow oxidation process that results  in rusting of iron.&#0160; This   rusting happened immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Basements  Of WTC Buildings  Undamaged<\/span> &#8211; \u201cStuffed mannequins  in the basement  of WTC with clothing  on were carried out of the  basement undamaged.&#0160; If  a 100+-story WTC  building collapsed into its  basement and left a  35-story rubble pile,  there would be nothing left  in the basement. Even  streetcars underground  at the WTC were pulled  out after the collapse  and had no damage.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Prof.  Cahill Air Monitoring Samples<\/span> &#8211; \u201cThe hardest and most  durable  materials vaporized (steel, concrete  etc), and the most  fragile  materials (paper) cascading out of WTC  windows and all over  the ground  for blocks were undamaged.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Truckloads  of Potting Soil<\/span> &#8211;  \u201cRight after the WTC disaster,  the ground was  \u201cfuming\u201d, and sequential  FEMA aerial photos show 130  dump trucks full  of soil (filled almost to  the top of the dump truck  space) covered with  tarps so that the dirt in  the trucks was not  visible to onlookers on  the street, coming into the  WTC area, dumping  the soil and going out  for more. This happened even  before the rescues  or cleanup started and  it continued for some time.  The piles of soil  were left for a week and  got higher each day in  sequential photos. The  soil \u2018fuming\u2019 lasted  until March 2002 (8  months).\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Boots Disintegrated<\/span> \u2013  \u201cBoots on emergency  responders  disintegrated after 2 hours.&#0160; They had  to get new boots every  2 hours \u2013  an effect of molecular dissociation.&#0160;  It was not from  burning, their  skin would have been damaged.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">No  Ground Fuming  During Rain<\/span> &#8211; \u201cFor 99 days the \u201cburning\u201d  (fuming)  continued at the  WTC site, but when it rained there was no  fuming. If  it had been fires  burning, the rain would have caused steam  from  heating rainwater.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">USGS:  Iron versus Steel<\/span> -&#0160; \u201cThe  USGS analyzed the mineral  form of the  rust on steel beams and iron  objects at the WTC. They did  not address  the \u2018steel does not rust\u2019  issue, but dodged it by  referring to the  rusted steel beams in the  rubble pile as \u2018iron beams\u2019  and gave mineral  analyses of iron minerals  produced by oxidation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Official  Sample Data Not Reliable<\/span> \u2013 \u201cSpectral absorption  images at the WTC  indicated average particle  size was about 1 micron,  which is subjected  to gravity and would have  fallen with the collapsed  buildings. USGS did  not collect many dust  samples and collecting  samples by other different  agencies did not  agree with each other. No  samples were taken at the  toasted cars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Directed Energy Weapon Evidence <\/span>&#8211; \u201cEvidence  of use of a   directed energy weapon was present at the top of the WTC  buildings as   \u2018lathering up\u2019 started before buildings started coming  down. <a href=\"http:\/\/drjudywood.com\/articles\/dirt\/dirt5.html#lathersequence\" target=\"_blank\">\u2018Lathering up\u2019 <\/a>in  videos preceded the collapse of   all buildings, even Building 7 which  supposedly Larry Silverstein when   he said, &#39;Pull it&#39; to firefighters  meant controlled demolition. Color   alteration and modification in news  videos compared to other   photos\/videos at tops of buildings indicates  \u201cdoctoring\u201d of images.&#0160;   When the Seattle Dome was destroyed with  controlled demolition, the dust   created by the destruction did not get  any higher than the top of the   building. The WTC dust got into the  upper atmosphere almost immediately  \u2013  which indicates very tiny  atmospheric dust sized particles (0.1  micron  and smaller), in fact  smaller than atmospheric dust that stays  mainly in  the Troposphere.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u201cLathering Up\u201d Incriminating<\/span> &#8211; \u201cWTC  Building 7 <a href=\"http:\/\/drjudywood.com\/articles\/dirt\/dirt5.html#lathersequence\" target=\"_blank\">\u2018lathered up\u2019<\/a> even before WTC Building 2 went down.   WTC Building 7 not damaged at  all by WTC Building 2 going down \u2013 right   next to each other.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Freon tanks<\/span> -&#0160; \u201cVery odd, large  tanks  were removed from WTC  building and OSHA made bogus statement  about what  and why they were  removed. Was freon used in WTC takedown? A  NYC cop  whom the researcher  met with Cindy Sheehan said he was injured  in WTC  Building 7 and  removed on a gurney, but his eyes were covered  so he  could not see  anything as they left the building.&#0160; He reported he  was  able to see  dead bodies lying all over the floor as he was being  carried  out \u2013  before building 7 had collapsed.&#0160; Was this due to Freon   asphyxiation  put through ventilation system like in a recent Russian   submarine  disaster?<\/p>\n<p><strong>This prima facie evidence of the  use of U.S. exotic black  budget technologies in 9\/11 can bring the  perpetrators of 9\/11 to  justice<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m4d2-Memo-to-US-Congress-prima-facie-evidence-that-Bush-Cheney-and-Rumsfeld-committed-treason-on-911\" target=\"_blank\"><em>prima  facie<\/em><\/a> eyewitness, whistleblower and documentary evidence now  available that  these four exotic black budget technologies in the sole  possession of  the U.S. military-intelligence sector is sufficient to  bring the  perpetrators of the false flag operation of September 11, 2001  to  justice under the following provision of the U.S. constitution, and   related criminal laws for non-U.S. citizens who were perpetrators of the   false flag operation of 9\/11.<\/p>\n<p>Article III (3) of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner%7Ey2010m4d2-Memo-to-US-Congress-prima-facie-evidence-that-Bush-Cheney-and-Rumsfeld-committed-treason-on-911\" target=\"_blank\">U.S.  Constitution<\/a> provides: &quot;Sect. 3. Treason against the United States,  shall consist  only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their  enemies,  giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of  treason  unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act,  or on  open confession in open court.&quot;<\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow: hidden; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;\"><em>_____________________<\/em><br \/><em>COPYRIGHT: Permission to use extracts &amp; copyright notice<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Copyright Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, All right reserved<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original article. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>This article is copyrighted and should not be added in its entirety on other websites or email lists without author&#39;s written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com. Thank you.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd This article is part of an ongoing series on U.S. black budget exotic technologies, their use in the 9\/11 false flag psyops, and the consequent impact on humanity\u2019s social and exopolitical future. New computer analysis by UK researcher Richard D. Hall has revealed that an anti-gravity remote controlled UFO [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/exopolitics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}