As a graduate pychological counsellor from the University of Texas (M.Ed. 1997), I have come to the professional conclusion that Richard Boylan is either psychologically delusional or operating under some form of mind control. Of course, there is the possibility that Dr. Boylan is simply a very mal-intentioned fellow who enjoys stigmatizing and slandering others publicly, in order to raise his own self-esteem inside a delusionary system in which he is "Councilor of Earth".<\/p>\n
Why do I come to this conclusion about Richard Boylan?<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. Examiner.com<\/strong><\/em> – Well, for one, Richard Boylan has been continually stating that the "Examiner" is my personal blog disguised as a newspaper.<\/p>\n Any compentent and reasonable person, let alone professional would be able to go to wikipedia and see that Examiner.com, for which I am the Seattle Exopolitics Examiner has 55,000 Examiners. 2. Pattern of twisting reality<\/em><\/strong> – Secondly, Richard Boylan deliberately twists my reporting in Examine.com to suit his own slander of my person.<\/p>\n What I stated in the Examiner.com article was:<\/p>\n "The original Xinhua news article and news broadcast can be accessed at this URL:<\/p>\n http:\/\/big5.xinhuanet.com\/gate\/big5\/news.xinhuanet.com\/video\/2011-01\/04\/c_12944686.htm<\/a><\/p>\n "An opposite view by a China ET observer<\/strong><\/p>\n "One veteran China observer of expolitical affairs takes an opposite view. <\/p>\n "He writes, "The political processes associated with Chinese National Security including elements forming political mass [interpret UFOs as] a danger to the stability of Chinese Society.<\/p>\n "Chinese say 'eat rice'! remember that for as long as you are watching Chinese politics. They eat rice but do not spit any out whilst talking. These people are strategists and the finest poker players on the planet. They will not disclose anything.<\/p>\n "The Youtube video in Mandarin<\/a> is of President HU talking about websites in the USA that put up sensationalist articles on UFOs, ET and disclosure. He spoke about the USA making some good films like CONTACT but some rather exaggerated and over the top films like 2012.<\/p>\n "Everyone in China knows that the China \/Obama disclosure story is a rumor; but at the same time everyone knows that China is being buzzed by UFOs which have closed 2 airports and created amazing aerial displays from time to time, particularly noted by Chinese academics in astronomy.<\/p>\n "My view is to forget about this China\/Obama disclosure issue at this point in time because most people here see disclosure as an organic process, under ET timing and methodologies; a process which is intensifying alongside changes in the earths basic resonances. A necessary cosmic conditioning process for masses by the ETs, without the need for a disclosure date by a terra politician. China see's the US people as helpless, trapped by financial disaster and under extreme control of a shadow government. They love the US people but despise the US shadow government."<\/p>\n What Richard Boylan alleges is stated in my Examiner.com article bears no relation to reality, as does Richard Boylan's assertions about Examiner.com.<\/p>\n This is an additional reason is why I have come to the professional conclusion that Richard Boylan is either psychologically delusional, or mal-intentionally twisting reality in order to intentionally slander targets of his such as myself so as to elevate himself into a delusional role as "Councilor of Earth."<\/p><\/div>\n 3. Acts of moral turpitude<\/strong><\/em> - Set out at the end of the email below is the full text of the Board of Psychology of the State of California revoking Richard Boylan's license to practice on August 4, 1995. <\/p>\n Although the Board of Psychology, of course, cannot revoke Richard Boylan's PhD in psychology, this is tantamount to a revocation of his ability to functionally practice psychology and counseling others. <\/p>\n The grounds for Richard Boylan's revocation of license to practice as a psychologist were moral trupitude – gross negligence and sexual impropriety with patients.<\/p>\n The legal findings of the California Board of Psychology were as follows show a clear pattern of sexual impropriety with patients.<\/p>\n At this time, Richard Boylan's specialty is the coordination of children's groups, where there is opportunity for sexual abuse and impropriety with children, under the guise of being an extraterrestrially chosen "Councilor of Earth"<\/p>\n I<\/p>\n While the patients in this matter each questioned, at Respondent abused his role as a therapist and was 19<\/p>\n ————————————————————————–<\/p>\n III<\/p>\n Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of IV V VI Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of VIII<\/p>\n It was not established that the act of inviting K.G. IX X<\/p>\n Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of ————————————————————————–<\/p>\n 4992.3(d) by shifting the focus of D.S.'s therapy from her &# While it may have been thoughtless, or possibly It was not established that respondent discussed with XIII<\/p>\n Determinations II – V, VII, IX and X, and each of them ORDER I<\/p>\n The Psychologist, Licensed Social Worker and Marriage, II<\/p>\n Respondent shall pay costs to the Board of Behavioral Richard Boylan is in fact attacking persons who expose him as a clear and present danger to the well-being of the community, and as a person who is engaging in a continual pattern of intentional distortion of facts about others in order to aggradize his own delusional position as "Councilor of Earth".<\/p>\n I rest my case.<\/p>\n In Light, EXHIBITS<\/strong><\/p>\n EXAMINER.COM<\/a> WIKIPEDIA DESCRIPTION<\/strong><\/p>\n http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Examiner.com<\/a><\/p>\n
(See Wikipedia description below at end of this email).<\/p>\n
DETERMINATION OF ISSUES
———————–<\/p>\n
times, the sexual motivation of respondent, it was not
established he in fact has such motivation while providing
therapy or other relationships to these patients. It is not
necessary for respondent's motivation to be sexual for sexual
abuse to occur. Great weight must be given to the "victim's"
perspective. Here, however, the victims were not sure what was
going on. There was no sexual contact. They were upset and
confused. The evidence did not establish sexual misconduct in
violation of Business and Professions Code sections 726, 2960(o),
4982(k) or 4992.3(k)<\/p>\n
II<\/p>\n
grossly negligent, in violation of Business and Professions Code
section 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d) in imposing his personal
views of D.W. and D.S., as set forth in Finding III and V.<\/p>\n
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
4992.3(d) when he developed an inappropriate dual relationship
with D.W. that included travel together to and around Las Vegas,
as established bt Findings III.<\/p>\n
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
4992.3(d), when he gave D.W. a massage in his hotel room in Las
Vegas, as established by Findings III.<\/p>\n
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
4992.3(d), when he invited D.W. to his home in November 1992 and
engaged in nude hot tubbing, as established by Findings III.
<\/p>\n
The evidence did not establish that respondent
suggested that he perform a vaginal examination on D.W.
VII<\/p>\n
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
4992.3(d), when he invited K.G. to his home in December 1991 and
engaged in nude hot tubbing, as established by Findings IV.<\/p>\n
and D.S. for nude therapy sessions at Harbin Hot Springs amounted
to gross negligence, in violation of Business and Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d).<\/p>\n
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
4992.3(d), when he bartered therapy for nude massages from K.G.,
as established by Findings V.<\/p>\n
Business and Professions Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
20<\/p>\n
presenting problems to his interest in ET encounters, as
established by Findings V.<\/p>\n
\n0160; XI<\/p>\n
negligent for respondent to try to recreate a Native American
ritual with D.S. present, it did not rise to the level of gross
negligence.
XII<\/p>\n
D.S. details of his sexual relationship with his wife.<\/p>\n
are grounds for discipline.<\/p>\n
—–<\/p>\n
Family and Child Counselor licenses issued to respondent Richard
Boylan are revoked.<\/p>\n
Science Examiners in the sum of $9205\/
<\/em><\/div>\n
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Vancouver, B.C.
January 24, 2011<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/d\/d4\/Button_hide.png\" "\\"close\\"")
<\/div>\nExaminer.com<\/h1>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/6\/6f\/Examiner-logo-vertical.jpg\/220px-Examiner-logo-vertical.jpg\"){kind=logo}
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/bits.wikimedia.org\/skins-1.5\/common\/images\/magnify-clip.png\")
<\/a><\/div>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/a\/a8\/Examiner-screenshot.jpg\/220px-Examiner-screenshot.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n