{"id":36,"date":"2023-01-16T10:08:47","date_gmt":"2023-01-16T10:08:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/international-criminal-co\/index.php\/2023\/01\/16\/to-defendants-respondents-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-islamic-republic-of-iran-islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan-internationa\/"},"modified":"2023-01-16T10:08:47","modified_gmt":"2023-01-16T10:08:47","slug":"to-defendants-respondents-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-islamic-republic-of-iran-islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan-internationa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/omniversity.us\/international-criminal-co\/index.php\/2023\/01\/16\/to-defendants-respondents-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-islamic-republic-of-iran-islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan-internationa\/","title":{"rendered":"TO- DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS Kingdom of Saudi Arabia + Islamic Republic of Iran + Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan – INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL THIS IS LAWFUL SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ATTACHED PDF EMERGENCY Cease and Desist Order & Writ of Mandamus"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"International-tribunal-logo<\/a><\/p>\n

TRIBUNAL: https:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/international_criminal_co\/2023\/01\/to-defendants-respondents-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-islamic-republic-of-iran-islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan-internationa.html<\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n
TO- DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS Kingdom of Saudi Arabia + Islamic Republic of Iran + Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan – INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL <\/strong><\/div>\n
THIS IS LAWFUL SERVICE OF PROCESS OF ATTACHED PDF EMERGENCY Cease and Desist Order & Writ of Mandamus<\/strong><\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
DOWNLOAD PDF TRIBUNAL CEASE & DESIST ORDER AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS:<\/div>\n
Download TO- DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS Kingdom of Saudi Arabia + Islamic Republic of Iran + Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan – INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL Cease and Desist Order & Writ of Mandamus<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
https:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/files\/to–defendants-respondents-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-islamic-republic-of-iran-islamic-emirate-of-afghanistan—international-tribunal-cease-and-desist-order-writ-of-mandamus.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
\n

Natural and Common Law Tribunal
For Public Health and Justice
www.peaceinspace.org<\/p>\n

CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
EMERGENCY PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AGAINST NAMED AND UNNAMED DEFENDANT RESPONDENTS IN:
\u2022 DEFENDANT KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
\u2022 DEFENDANT ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
\u2022 DEFENDANT ISLAMIC EMIRATE OF AFGHANISTAN
FOR:<\/p>\n

\u2022 GENOCIDAL IMPOSITION OF UNLAWFUL AND DISCRIMINATORY
GENDER-BASED DRESS CODES, EDUCATION, WORK, MOVEMENT, POLITICAL AND COMMUNICATION RESTRICTIONS FOR WOMEN
\u2022 SUMMARY GENOCIDAL EXECUTIONS OF SOVEREIGN HUMAN BEINGS,
\u2022 VIOLATIONS OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS,
INCLUDING AND NOT LIMITED TO
UNLAWFUL AND GENOCIDAL VIOLATIONS OF:
\u2022 FREEDOM OF EDUCATION, WORK, PROFESSION, THOUGHT, SPEECH,
VOTING RIGHTS, GENDER SOVEREIGNTY,
PERSONAL MOVEMENT RIGHTS,
PHILOSOPHICAL, SPIRITUAL, WORSHIP & RESEARCH RIGHTS
as
Genocide and Crimes against Humanity
Under Natural Law, Common Law, Treaty Law, Articles 6 and 7 of the International
Criminal Court Statute, the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Conventions, the United
Nations Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, the Final Judgment of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for
Public Health and Justice at www.peaceinspace.org . <\/p>\n

\u2022 EMERGENCE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO:
INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL
\u2022 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGAINST
\u2022 ABOVE-NAMED NAMED & UN-NAMED DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS
FOR
\u2022 GENOCIDE,
\u2022 CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY,
\u2022 CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
\u2022 VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERNATIONAL LAWS
AND TREATIES<\/p>\n

EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS
\u201cThe lawful term writ of mandamus refers to an order by a court to a lesser government official
to perform an act required by law, which he has refused or neglected to do. This type of court
order is a remedy that may be sought if a governmental agency, public authority, or corporation
in service of the government, fails or refuses to do its public or statutory duty.\u201d<\/p>\n

TO APPOINTED AND\/OR ELECTED
(a) INTERPOL,
(b) NATIONAL DEFENCE,
(c) JUSTICE,
(d) NATIONAL POLICE,
(e) CONSTITUTIONAL LAW INVESTIGATION ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS,
(f) CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, and
(g) SHERIFFS NAMED\/UNNAMED HEREIN
(h) ATTORNEYS GENERAL NAMED & UNNAMED HEREIN
(I) MEMBERS OF ELECTED PARLIAMENTARY & SENATE ASSEMBLIES AS
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ENFORCECERS HEREIN:<\/p>\n

YOU ARE HEREBY SERVED WITH AN EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS
ORDERING YOU TO IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFY, DOCUMENT, INVESTIGATE,
REMOVE, ARREST & INCARCERATE CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS &
DEFENDANTS NAMED\/UNNAMED HEREIN for the Commission of Genocide and
Crimes against Humanity Under Natural Law, Common Law, Treaty Law, Articles 6 and 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute, the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Conventions, the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the Final Judgment of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice at www.peaceinspace.org .<\/p>\n

CONTINUE READING TRIBUNAL DOCUMENT AT THIS LINK:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

International Criminal Court Statute
Ratified by 123 Nations
As Applied by this Tribunal<\/p>\n

Article 5
Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the
following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.<\/p>\n

Article 6
Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, "genocide" means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.<\/p>\n

Article 7
Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as
part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.<\/p>\n

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
(b) "Extermination" includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;
(c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in particular women and children;
(d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;
(e) "Torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;
(f) "Forced pregnancy" means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;
(g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to
international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;
(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
(i) "Enforced disappearance of persons" means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged
period of time.
3. For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term "gender" refers to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term "gender" does not indicate any meaning different from the above.<\/p>\n

Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/p>\n

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages. The UDHR is widely recognized as having inspired, and paved the way for, the adoption of more than seventy human rights treaties, applied today on a permanent basis at global and regional levels (all containing references to it in their preambles).
Preamble<\/p>\n

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,<\/p>\n

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,<\/p>\n

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,<\/p>\n

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,<\/p>\n

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,<\/p>\n

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,<\/p>\n

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,<\/p>\n

Now, therefore,<\/p>\n

The General Assembly,<\/p>\n

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
Article 1<\/p>\n

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2<\/p>\n

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 3<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4<\/p>\n

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5<\/p>\n

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7<\/p>\n

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 9<\/p>\n

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 10<\/p>\n

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11<\/p>\n

Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.<\/p>\n

Article 12<\/p>\n

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 13<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.<\/p>\n

Article 14<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.<\/p>\n

Article 15<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to a nationality.
No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.<\/p>\n

Article 16<\/p>\n

Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.<\/p>\n

Article 17<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.<\/p>\n

Article 18<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
No one may be compelled to belong to an association.<\/p>\n

Article 21<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.<\/p>\n

Article 22<\/p>\n

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Article 23<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.<\/p>\n

Article 24<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Article 25<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.<\/p>\n

Article 26<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.<\/p>\n

Article 27<\/p>\n

Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.<\/p>\n

Article 28<\/p>\n

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29<\/p>\n

Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.<\/p>\n

Article 30<\/p>\n

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.<\/p>\n

Universal Declaration of Human Rights MORE at above link\u2026..<\/p>\n

Text of the Declaration
History of the Declaration
Drafters of the Declaration
The Foundation of International Human Rights Law
Human Rights Law<\/p>\n

UDHR Illustrated
Cover of the illustrated version of the UDHR.<\/p>\n

Read the Illustrated edition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
UDHR in 80+ languages
nine people in rows of 3 facing camera<\/p>\n

Watch and listen to people around the world reading articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in more than 80 languages.
Women Who Shaped the Declaration
Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt, seated at right speaking with Mrs. Hansa Mehta who stands next to her.<\/p>\n

Women delegates from various countries played a key role in getting women\u2019s rights included in the Declaration. Hansa Mehta of India (standing above Eleanor Roosevelt) is widely credited with changing the phrase "All men are born free and equal" to "All human beings are born free and equal" in Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.<\/p>\n

\u2003<\/p>\n

JURISDICTION OF THIS
TRIBUNAL OF CONSCIENCE<\/p>\n

Private Tribunals of Conscience
Their History and Why They Matter
Ralph Fucetola, JD<\/p>\n

Tribunals of Conscience and Crimes Against Humanity
Over the past century and more, various private Tribunals of Conscience have focused the moral judgment of humanity in situations where official bodies have either failed to hold violators of human rights to account or have been themselves the perpetrators of horrific acts that shock the conscience.
These nongovernmental, private expressive associations must be distinguished from international legal tribunals, such as the Nuremberg Tribunals and the International Court of Justice, which are examples of multinational courts established by governments under international law to try cases of making war and of war crimes.
International Criminal Tribunals
Discussing the impact of International Criminal Tribunals, a recent paper from the Netherlands noted,
\u201cThe idea that a ruler\u2019s power cannot be absolute, that there must be standards beyond the ruler to protect his citizens, has become the foundation stone of international human rights law. But the idea of international criminal law, and international criminal tribunals, goes a step further. In the extreme case where the ruler commits or condones crimes against his people, it takes not only the formulation of norms, but also the administration of punitive justice out of his hands and up to the international level, even to the point where he himself can be tried on criminal charges. . . .
Yet the symbolic power of international criminal tribunals may be far greater than their legal authority and capacity would suggest. In the cases of Georgia and Kenya, the threat of an ICC investigation appears to be spurring national investigations. Above all, in the former Yugoslavia and in the situations the ICC is currently investigating, the existence of the investigations has given local civil society actors room to discuss \u201cdifficult subjects\u201d related to the recent past, such as the occurrence of massacres, the use of mass rape as a political instrument, the use of child-soldiers, and the issue of accountability in whatever shape.\u201d [1]
Crimes Against Humanity
International Law is ambiguous with regard to Crimes Against Humanity (CAHs).
\u201cUnlike genocide and war crimes, which have been widely recognized and prohibited in international criminal law since the establishment of the Nuremberg principles, there has never been a comprehensive convention on crimes against humanity, even though such crimes are continuously perpetrated worldwide in numerous conflicts and crises. There are eleven international texts defining crimes against humanity, but they all differ slightly as to their definition of that crime and its legal elements.\u201d [2]
While the phrase \u201cCrimes Against Humanity\u201d (Class C Charges) was used in the post-World War II imposition of \u201cvictors justice\u201d against CAH perpetrators on the losing side, \u201cthe charge of crimes against peace was a prerequisite to prosecution\u2014only those individuals whose crimes included crimes against peace could be prosecuted by the Tribunal. In the event, no [independent] Class C charges were heard in Tokyo\u2026\u201d [3]
The failure of governments to respond to public concerns regarding CAH necessitates and justifies private persons constituting themselves into private associations for the purpose of condemning violations of basic humane standards.
Before the earliest Tribunals of Conscience there were several important international campaigns which contained elements later developed by the Tribunals. These include campaigns against slavery which started even before the beginning of the 19th Century. Often led by concerns of conscience, by religious libertarians such as the Quakers, the anti-slavery movement included a major element of the Tribunals: the public condemnation of acts seen as immoral. [4]
Similarly, private commissions of investigation were established to oppose the horrific abuses in the Congo during the early 19th Century when that territory was a personal fiefdom of the King of the Belgians. Slavery enforced by brutalities, including dismemberment, was widely condemned and various private campaigns, often led by clergy, investigated and condemned the violations of humanitarian standards. It was one of those campaigns where the phrase \u201cCrimes Against Humanity\u201d was first used. [5] Later the phrase was used in reference to the genocide against Armenians by the Ottoman Empire. [6]
Tribunals of Conscience
Various nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have sought to define \u201cTribunals of Conscience\u201d.
The National Lawyers Guild, for example, has posited the following:
\u201cA Tribunal of Conscience is a People\u2019s Tribunal. Such tribunals date back more than six decades to the era of the Russell Tribunal on US war crimes in Viet Nam and the Universal Declaration of the Rights of People (Algiers, 1976). They provide an alternative forum for those who find no recourse in the formal institutions of the state or the international community. They are the place where the people judge the crimes of the state, not where the state judges the people.\u201d [7]
Perhaps the earliest self-denoted Tribunal of Conscience was that convoked by B. Russell and J-P. Sartre regarding the War in Vietnam, in 1966. After two public sessions in Europe the Tribunal published a strong condemnation of United States\u2019 actions in Vietnam in 1967.
Russel quoted Robert H. Jackson, the Chief Nuremberg Prosecutor, in justification of the establishment of the Tribunal:
\u201cIf certain acts and violations of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them. We are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.\u201d \u2014\u2009Justice Robert H. Jackson [8]
The Russel\/Sartre Tribunal encouraged subsequent private efforts:
\u201cAdditional tribunals have been conducted in the following decades on the same model, using the denomination Russell Tribunal. E.g., The Russell Tribunal on Latin America focused on human rights violations in the military dictatorships of Argentina and Brazil (Rome, 1973), on Chile\u2019s military coup d\u2019\u00e9tat (Rome, 1974\u201376), on the situation of Human Rights in Germany (1978), on the Threat of Indigenous Peoples of America (1982), on Human Rights in Psychiatry (Berlin, 2001), on Iraq (Brussels, 2004), and on Palestine (Barcelona, 2009\u201312).\u201d [9]
These efforts have also continued beyond the Russel\/Sartre model. The \u201cPermanent Peoples\u2019 Tribunal was established at the behest of a member of the Senate of Italy in Bologna in the late 1970s. It has held 46 sessions regarding separate Crimes Against Humanity over the ensuing decades. [10] These sessions have reviewed situations involving CAHs primarily against peoples who are not recognized as \u201cnations\u201d, such as the population of Western Sahara or the Kurds, who live in several Middle Eastern nations.
Recent Developments
Other Tribunals of Conscience have included the 2009 Agent Orange Tribunal of the International Democratic Lawyers Association [11]; the 2020 Belmarish Tribunal regarding the persecution of Julian Assange [12]; and the 2019 China Tribunal which states:
\u201cThe China Tribunal is an independent people\u2019s tribunal established to inquire into forced organ harvesting from, amongst others, prisoners of conscience in China and to investigate what criminal offences, if any, have been committed by state or state-approved bodies, organisations or individuals in China that may have engaged in forced organ harvesting. \u201c [13]
During the 2020-2021 period of the \u201cDeclared Pandemic\u201d the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice was established to hold the perpetrators of what the Tribunal found to be the \u201cGenocidal Technologies Pandemic\u201d accountable. It entered a formal judgment against various state-actors, politicians, businesses and NGOs for their various roles in triggering the false-flag \u201cpandemic\u201d and rushing \u201cunavoidably unsafe\u201d vaccines, including nov
\nel class of \u201cgene altering\u201d injections into production and deployment. [14]
Humanity Benefits from Tribunals of Conscience
\u201cWhat\u201d, the skeptic may ask, \u201cis the value of private Tribunals of Conscience to humanity?\u201d
We live in a world where the promise of global peace and prosperity has become a distortion used to empower globalist elites with their demonstrated eugenocidal agenda (most recently, through the Declared COVID Pandemic), where relations among nation-states resemble the brutal behavior of thugs \u2014 a true Hobbesian international order. The new religion of this world is Statism, the worship of the institutions of the States, including their judicial institutions and administrative indiscretions.
As the lack of intellectual viability of Statism in its various racial, religious, national, international, bureaucratic, imperialist and other forms becomes increasingly exposed and become, perhaps, increasingly irrelevant in an economically globalized, blockchain-enabled, post-singularity world, an alternative to state-sponsored \u201cjustice\u201d is needed.
The juridical subjects of International Law, \u201cInternational Actors,\u201d include nation-states (even micro-states like the Vatican), a certain few private associations (like the Red Cross or Sovereign Knights of Malta), and international agencies like the UN along with its associated institutions (such as certain privileged NGOs and \u201cspecialized agencies\u201d \u2014 WHO and FAO, for example). Not included in this list are actual private persons, natural or cultural Nations, even juridical persons such as private associations and registered corporations.
The humans and human organizations with which we usually interact are missing from the globalist structure of international relations.
We individuals do not exist in the currently dominant Statist view of international law.
In the eyes of Globalist International Actors, we real people and our private associations are little more than disregarded entities. This state of affairs is entirely unsatisfactory to humane individuals.
Consider the long march of human history and how treating individual humans as objects led us to endless millennia of Statist imperial warfare, culminating the 20th Century\u2019s killing fields and nuclear incinerations.
Consider the historic role of Statism in the imposition of what libertarian philosopher and lawyer Lysander Spooner saw as the Great Monopolies: the horror of slavery, vicious state churches, the legal \u201cincapacities of women\u201d and the King\u2019s trade monopolies \u2013 all Statist institutions which have repeatedly perpetrated Crimes Against Humanity.
How can humanity trust the very Statist institutions which have so violated humane standards, by committing Crimes Against Humanity to exact meaningful justice for their own misdeeds, no matter how egregious?
Even as the vicious old concepts, chattel slavery, religious and racial bigotry, institutionalized inequality of women and various others, have become anathema to civilized people, the very concept a \u201csovereign\u201d State, not subject to the same rule of law that applies to private persons, must also be rejected. States and their political elites must be subject to true Justice or there is no Justice.
Clearly, that justice will not come from the very source of the criminality. Private persons of conscience must take the lead to expose and publicly condemn Crimes Against Humanity. This is the role, which is of inestimable value to humanity, of Private Tribunals of Conscience.
Enforcing Judgments of Tribunals of Conscience relies of free people of conscience: www.MarshallsofConscience.com
\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-
[1] https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/4171788\/International_Criminal_Tribunals
[2] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Crimes_against_humanity
[3] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Military_Tribunal_for_the_Far_East#Charges
[4] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Crimes_against_humanity#Abolition_of_the_slave_trade
[5] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Crimes_against_humanity#First_use
[6] https:\/\/www.armenian-genocide.org\/Affirmation.160\/current_category.7\/affirmation_detail.html
[7] www.inquirycommission.org \/ https:\/\/www.nlginternational.org\/report\/Final_Preliminary_ITC_Verdict.pdf
[8] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Russell_Tribunal
[9] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Russell_Tribunal#Subsequent_Tribunals
[10] https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Permanent_Peoples%27_Tribunal#List_of_sessions
[11] https:\/\/vn-agentorange.org\/edmaterials\/paris_2009_tribunal_decision_2.15.10.pdf
[12] https:\/\/popularresistance.org\/the-belmarsh-tribunal\/
[13] https:\/\/chinatribunal.com\/
[14] http:\/\/www.peaceinspace.org
Also posted at:
International Journal of Natural Health, Science and Policy
http:\/\/www.inhere.org\/international-journal-of-nhsp\/
\u2003<\/p>\n

AUTHORIZED TRIBUNAL INITIATIVES FOR 2023
Download TRIBUNAL AGENDA JANUARY 8 2023 AUTHORIZED TRIBUNAL INITIATIVES FOR 2023
https:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/files\/tribunal-agenda-january-8-2023-authorized-tribunal-initiatives-for-2023–1.pdf
WATCH ON ODYSEE: https:\/\/odysee.com\/@TrueTube:9d\/TRIBUNAL2023:b
WATCH ON RUMBLE: https:\/\/rumble.com\/v24ht4o-authorized-tribunal-of-conscience-initiatives-for-2023.html
READ ON TRIBUNAL WEBSITE https:\/\/exopolitics.blogs.com\/international_criminal_co\/2023\/01\/tribunal-agenda-january-8-2023-authorized-tribunal-initiatives-for-2023.html<\/p>\n

TRIBUNAL AGENDA
JANUARY 8, 2023
AUTHORIZED TRIBUNAL INITIATIVES FOR 2023
#5. Tribunal Cease and Desist Orders against Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity including Execution, Torture, Unlawful Prosecution, Detention, or Surveillance for alleged Violation of Speech Codes, Thought Codes, Dress Codes or Gender-based, Ethnic-based Social mandates that violate (a) the International Criminal Court Statute https:\/\/www.icc-cpi.int\/sites\/default\/files\/RS-Eng.pdf ban on Genocide [Article 6], Crimes Against Humanity [Article 7] or (b) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights https:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/udhrbook\/pdf\/udhr_booklet_en_web.pdf<\/p>\n

TO \u2013 DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA<\/p>\n

TO: HRM King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
TO: Crown Prince HRH Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud.
admin@cpc.gov.sa
TO: HE Fahd bin Mohammed bin Saleh Al-Issa, Chief of the Royal Court
https:\/\/www.my.gov.sa\/wps\/portal\/snp\/pages\/contact<\/p>\n

CONTACT & SERVICE OF PROCESS
TO: KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
https:\/\/www.my.gov.sa\/wps\/portal\/snp\/agencies\/agencyDetails\/AC104<\/p>\n

TO: Address of Mission
Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations (Vienna)
Formanekgasse 38
1190 Vienna
Telephone: (+43-1) 367 25 31
Fax: (+43-1) 367 25 40
Email: Saudimission.un@saudiembassy.at
TO: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Permanent Representative
H.E. Mr. Abdullah BIN KHALED BIN SULTAN AL SAUD
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
DPC: 02 Sep 19
Mrs. Nourah Bint Khalid Bin Saud Bin Khalid AL SAUD<\/p>\n

Alternate Permanent Representative
Mr. Abdulrazzak AL SADOON
Minister Plenipotentiary<\/p>\n

Advisor to the Permanent Representative
Ms. Norah Mohammed ALBASSAM
Counsellor
Mr. Ahmad Ibrahim A. ALGHAMDI
Counsellor
Mrs. Hadir Abdullah S. Alzahrani
Mr. Rashdan ALSAYYALI
First Secretary
Mrs. Rabab Alsayyali
Mr. Yasser AL AHMARI
First Secretary
Mrs. Amal Faez AL SHUFLUT
Mr. Ahmed SHARARA
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Talal Abdullah ALOTAIBI
Attach\u00e9
Ms. Abrar Alotaibi
Mr. Abdulrahman Ibrahim S. ALTHUNAYYAN
Third Secretary
Mr. Qies NASSEEF
Third Secretary
Ms. Hanadee Ahmed O. BAYAZID
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Sultan Faisal A. BINLIBDAH
First Secretary
Modhi Binlibdah
Mr. Saleh Mohammed H ALJAFRAN
First Secretary
Mrs. Nawal Faiz A Alshehri
Ms. Mona ALSHARIF
Second Secretary
Mr. Mohammad Othman M. BINKHENAIN
Second Secretary<\/p>\n

Other
Mr. Abdulrahman TALAL A. ALHAJAILAN
First Secretary
Ms. Assma Nasser M. Alhussan
Mr. Nasser THNAYAN N. ALTHNAYAN
Second Secretary
Mrs. Alya Alsaleh
Mr. Homoud Alhemaidi A. ALMUTAIRI
Attach\u00e9
Ms. Rawan Mohsen A. Almutairi
Mr. Ibrahim BINHUSSAIN
Attach\u00e9<\/p>\n

Advisor to the Permanent Representative
Mr. Bandar Hameed M. ALAMRI
Attach\u00e9
Ms Soad Saad A. Alzahrani
Mr. Abdullah ALSHEHRI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Noura Alamri
Mr. Mohammed BAASHEN
Attach\u00e9 Cultural
Mrs. Nazakat Ramazanova
Mr. Motlaq ALAJMI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Abeer Alajmi
Mr. Meshal ALRUQI
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Faisal ALHUMUD
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Ayidh ALOTAIBI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Shuaa Alotaibi
Abdullah ALSHEHRI
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Faizah Alshehri
Mr. Bandar Mohammed H. ALHARBI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Eman Saleem S. ALSUBHI
Ibrahim Khalid I. ALJURAYWI
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Muneerah Abdullah R. Alowain
Mr. Abdullah Ahmed M. ALHAZMI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Asma Makki M. Jubur
Mr. Mohammed Fahad M. ALHUMIDANI
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Shahad Abdulkarim S. Al Othman
Mr. Abdullah Nasser M. ALSUBAIE
Attach\u00e9
Mr. Abdulrahman Mohammed A. ALNASSER
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Hanan Abdullah M. Almhna
Mr. Mazen Yahya G. SHAR
Attach\u00e9
Mrs. Amal Ahmed A. Faqihi<\/p>\n

STATEMENT OF FACTS<\/p>\n

Saudi prosecutors seek death penalty for academic over social media use
Court documents reveal reasons for Awad Al-Qarni\u2019s arrest \u2013 even though rulers are major investors in social media platforms
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman seeks to project a modernising image of his country. Photograph: AFP\/Getty Images
Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington
Sun 15 Jan 2023 12.57 GMT
A prominent pro-reform law professor in Saudi Arabia is facing the death penalty for alleged crimes including having a Twitter account and using WhatsApp to share news considered \u201chostile\u201d to the kingdom, according to court documents seen by the Guardian.
The arrest of Awad Al-Qarni, 65, in September 2017 represented the start of a crackdown against dissent by the then newly named crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.
https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2023\/jan\/15\/saudi-arabian-academic-on-death-row-for-using-twitter-and-whatsapp<\/p>\n

Saudi Arabia executes 81 men in one day for terrorism, other offences
https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/middle-east\/saudi-arabia-executes-81-men-terrorism-other-charges-spa-2022-03-12\/<\/p>\n

Iran says Saudi executions violated human rights, international law
https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/middle-east\/iran-says-saudi-executions-violated-human-rights-international-law-2022-03-13\/<\/p>\n

TO: DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN<\/p>\n

TO DEFENDANT RESPONDENT Supreme Leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei is a Twelver Shia marja' and the second and current supreme leader of Iran, in office since 1989. Previously he served as the third president of Iran from 1981 to 1989. Wikipedia
Born: April 19, 1939 (age 83 years), Mashhad, Iran
Supreme Leader of Iran since 1989
The Supreme Leader of Iran, better known in Iran as the Supreme Leadership Authority, is the highest ranking religious and political leader in the country, and the Head of State of Iran. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran established the post of the Supreme Leader.
The office of the supreme leader is more powerful than the office of the president. The supreme leader is responsible for appointing senior officials in the military, judiciary, and the civil government. Initially, the Constitution reserved the office for the highest ranking cleric on religious laws, in 1989, the constitution was amended to allow lower ranking clerics with proficiency in Islamic laws to occupy the office. The Assembly of Experts elects the Supreme Leader and oversees his position. The Supreme Leader is in charge of the office for an 8-year term without prohibitions regarding the limiting of the number of terms. Since the position was established, the office has been occupied by two supreme leaders. The first was Ruhollah Khomeini, who became Iran\u2019s Supreme Leader immediately following the Iranian Revolution, occupying the office from 1979 until his death a decade later. The incumbent Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, took charge of the office shortly thereafter in 1989.
Organizations founded: Combatant Clergy Association, MORE
Grandchildren: Mohammad Bagher Khamenei, Fatemeh Sadaat, Mohammad Amin
Grandparents: Hashem Mirdamadi, Seyyed Hossein Khamenei
Nephew: Mohammad-Javad Khamenei<\/p>\n

TO: The Office of the Supreme Leader
https:\/\/www.leader.ir\/en\/contact
https:\/\/www.leader.ir\/en\/letter<\/p>\n

TO Dr Seyyed Hamid Sajjadi Hazaveh
President of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Address: Pasteur St., Pasteur Sq., Tehran
Phone number: +98(21)64451
https:\/\/president.ir\/en<\/p>\n

TO: Address of Mission
Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations (Vienna)
Jaur\u00e8sgasse 3
1030 Vienna
Telephone: (+43-1) 269 96 60
Fax: (+43-1) 269 97 91
Email: office@pmiran.at<\/p>\n

Permanent Representative
H.E. Mr. Mohsen NAZIRI ASL
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
DPC: 16 Aug 22
Mrs. Mehrangiz Naziri Asl
Alternate Permanent Representative
Mr. Abbas YAZDANI
Minister
Mrs. Seyedeh Laya Yazdani
Mr. Mostafa SHAFI ZADEH KHOULENJANI
Third Secretary
Mrs. Zohreh Shafi Zadeh Khoulenjan
Mr. Farhad GOLFAM
Attach\u00e9 Science
Mrs. Parisa Golfam
Mr. Khodayar ROUZBAHANI
Minister
Mrs. Farah Rouzbahani
Mr. Seyed Mohammad HASSANI
Minister
Mrs. Zahra Hassani
Mr. Seyed Hossein ZOLFAGHARI
Minister
Mrs. Marzieh Zolfaghari
Mr. Hojjatollah HASSAN ZADEH
Minister
Mrs. Parvin Hassan Zadeh
Mr. Nabiollah AZAMI SARDOUEI
Minister
Mrs. Asiyeh Azami Sardouei
Mr. Ramin SOLTANI ABKENAR
Second Secretary
TO:
Mrs. Zahra Soltani Abkenar
Advisor to the Permanent Representative
TO: Mr. Ali Asghar MOHEBBI REZAZADEH
Counsellor
TO: Mrs. Akram MOHEBBI REZAZADEH<\/p>\n

TO: Dr.Seyyed Ebrahim Raisi
Honorable President of Islamic Republic of Iran<\/p>\n

ET ALIOS:<\/p>\n

First Vice-President<\/p>\n

Dr Mohammad Mokhber<\/p>\n

Chief of Staff<\/p>\n

Dr Gholam Hossein Esmaili<\/p>\n

Vice President for Executive Affairs<\/p>\n

Mohsen Mansouri<\/p>\n

Vice-President and Head of the Administrative and Recruitment Affairs Organisation<\/p>\n

Dr Meysam Latifi<\/p>\n

Vice-President for Economic Affairs<\/p>\n

Dr Mohsen Rezaei Mirghaed<\/p>\n

Vice-President and Head of the Atomic Energy Organisation<\/p>\n

Mohammad Eslami<\/p>\n

Vice-President and Head of Plan and Budget Organisation<\/p>\n

Dr Seyyed Masoud Mirkazemi<\/p>\n

Vice-President and Head of the Martyrs and Veterans' Affairs Foundation<\/p>\n

Dr Seyyed Amir Hossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi<\/p>\n

Vice-President for Legal Affairs<\/p>\n

Dr Mohammad Dehghan<\/p>\n

Vice-President for Women and Family Affairs<\/p>\n

Dr Ensieh KhazAli<\/p>\n

Vice-President for Parliamentary Affairs<\/p>\n

Dr Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini<\/p>\n

Vice-President and Head of Department of Environment<\/p>\n

Dr Ali Salajegheh<\/p>\n

Vice-President for Science Technology and Knowledge-Based Economy<\/p>\n

Dr Rouhollah Dehghani Firouzabadi<\/p>\n

Minister of Education<\/p>\n

Dr Yousef Nouri<\/p>\n

Minister of Communications and Information Technology<\/p>\n

Dr Issa Zarepour<\/p>\n

Minister of Intelligence<\/p>\n

Hojjatoleslam val-Moslemin Seyyed Esmail Khatib<\/p>\n

Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance<\/p>\n

Dr Ehsan Khandouzi<\/p>\n

Minister of Health and Medical Education<\/p>\n

Dr Bahram Einollahi<\/p>\n

Minister of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare<\/p>\n

Dr Seyyed Solat Mortazavi<\/p>\n

Minister of Agricultural Jihad<\/p>\n

Dr Seyed Javad Sadati Nejad<\/p>\n

Minister of Foreign Affairs<\/p>\n

Dr Hossein Amir Abdollahian<\/p>\n

Minister of Justice<\/p>\n

Dr Amin Hossein Rahimi<\/p>\n

Minister of Defence and Armed Forces\u2019 Logistics<\/p>\n

Brigadier General Dr Mohammad Reza Ashtiani<\/p>\n

Minister of Roads and Urban Development<\/p>\n

Mehrdad bazrpash<\/p>\n

Minister of Industry, Mining and Trade<\/p>\n

Dr Seyyed Reza Fatemi Amin<\/p>\n

Minister of Science, Research and Technology<\/p>\n

Dr Mohammad Ali Zolfigol<\/p>\n

Minister of Islamic Culture and Guidance<\/p>\n

Dr Mohammad Mehdi Esmaili<\/p>\n

Minister of Interior<\/p>\n

Dr Ahmad Vahidi<\/p>\n

Minister of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism<\/p>\n

Seyyed Ezzatollah Zarghami<\/p>\n

Minister of Petroleum<\/p>\n

Javad Oji<\/p>\n

Minister of Energy<\/p>\n

Ali Akbar Mehrabian<\/p>\n

Minister of Sports and Youth Affairs<\/p>\n

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Copyright Offices
Competent administration Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance,
Registrar of Copyright,
Center for Cultural Studies and Research (CCSR)
Address<\/p>\n

Kamalolmolk Street
Tehran
Iran<\/p>\n

Telephone (98) 21 33 90 3895
(98) 3851 2536
(98) 3311 4618
Telefax (98) 21 3311 0841
TO: Industrial Property Offices
Competent administration Intellectual Property Center
of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Web site address http:\/\/iripo.ssaa.ir\/
Address<\/p>\n

Emam Khomaini Square
Khayam st, Shahid Fayaz Bakhsh st
Sazemane Sabte Asnad va Amlak
Building No. 3
Tehran<\/p>\n

Telephone (98 21) 6671 2598
(98 21) 6674 1035
Telefax (98-21) 6670 0867
E-mail address Mahdi.alizadeh@ssaa.ir
Iran.ipc@ssaa.ir
Title and name of head Deputy of Judiciary and Head of the State Organization for Registration of Deeds and Properties: H. E.Dr. Hassan Babaei
TO: President of Intellectual Property Center: Mr. Mahdi ALIZADEH
WIPO logo<\/p>\n

TO Islamic Republic of Iran
Ministry of Foreign Relations<\/p>\n

Phone: 61151
public relations : 66739191
FAX: 61154275<\/p>\n

zip code : 1136914811
web site: www.mfa.ir
email : info@mfa.gov.ir<\/p>\n

Address: Imam Khomeini St, Imam Khomeini Sq, Tehran , Iran<\/p>\n

TO: The UNHCR Representation in the Islamic Republic of Iran<\/p>\n

Street Address:
UNHCR OR Tehran-Iran, No.3, East Emdad St., North Shiraz Ave., Vanak Sq., Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic Of), 19917-75941 Iran (Islamic Republic Of)<\/p>\n

Mailing Address:
No 3, East Emdad Street,, North Shiraz Ave, Vanak Sq, 1991775941 Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic Of)<\/p>\n

Telephone:
98 21 429 39<\/p>\n

Facsimile:
98 21 89 349 900<\/p>\n

Email:
irnte@unhcr.org<\/p>\n

Time Zone:
GMT + 3.3<\/p>\n

STAEMENT OF FACTS<\/p>\n

\u2018Silence is not the answer\u2019: Iranian-Canadians horrified by first-known execution
The Islamic Republic has conducted its first known execution in connection to the anti-regime protests that have rocked the country since the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini.
Mohsen Shekari, 23, was reportedly hanged after being found guilty by a revolutionary court of \u201cwaging war against God.\u201d
According to Mizan news agency, which is run by the regime\u2019s judiciary, Shekari was accused of blocking a street and wounding a member of the pro-regime Basij militia on Sept. 25.
Rights groups, such as Oslo-based Iran Human Rights, say Shekari was tortured and forced to confess with a sham trial without any due process.
https:\/\/globalnews.ca\/news\/9336586\/iranian-canadians-horrified-first-known-execution\/<\/p>\n

This Iranian Canadian's cousin was arrested suddenly in Iran. He wants you to know her name to protect her
Iranian 'change-makers' are targets for arrest, says Vancouver activist Amir Bajehkian
On Monday, a group of eight security police showed up at Semiramis Babaei's home in Tehran with a blank warrant, then used her brother's phone to send a text urging her to return home, according to her family in Canada.
No one has heard from the award-winning author and playwright since.
Her cousin, who lives in Vancouver, learned the news when he awoke at 4:30 a.m. PT and checked Instagram. He saw a message from family in Iran about the arrest.
"I was horrified," said Amir Bajehkian, 38, who lives near False Creek in Olympic Village.
He's one of many Iranian Canadians who live with a sickening fear for family members back in Iran, as they watch ongoing uprisings end in violence and mass arrests \u2014 and now, at least one execution.<\/p>\n

Bajehkian wants the world to know his cousin's name to keep a spotlight on her situation. He believes that will help protect her.
https:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/news\/world\/iran-arrests-executions-uprising-detained-semiramis-babaei-playwright-1.6681109<\/p>\n

Iran hangs Iranian-British ex-defense official for spy claim
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) \u2014 Iran said Saturday it executed a former high-ranking defense ministry official and dual Iranian-British national, despite international warnings not to carry out the death sentence. The execution further escalated tensions with the West amid the nationwide anti-government protests shaking the Islamic Republic.
The hanging of Ali Reza Akbari, a close ally of top security official Ali Shamkhani, suggests an ongoing power struggle within Iran's theocracy as it tries to contain the demonstrations over the September death of Mahsa Amini. It also harkened back to the mass purges of the military that immediately followed Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Akbari's hanging drew immediate anger from London, which along with the U.S. and others has sanctioned Iran over the protests and its supplying Russia with the bomb-carrying drones now targeting Ukraine.
\u201cThis was a callous and cowardly act, carried out by a barbaric regime with no respect for the human rights of their own people,\u201d British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said.
Foreign Secretary James Cleverly summoned Iran's charg\u00e9 d\u2019affaires in the United Kingdom and temporarily withdrew Britain's ambassador from Tehran as Britain also sanctioned the Islamic Republic's prosecutor-general.
\u201cOur response to Iran is not limited to today," he warned.
Iran similarly summoned the British ambassador after the execution.
Iran\u2019s Mizan news agency, associated with the country\u2019s judiciary, announced Akbari\u2019s hanging without saying when it happened. However, there were rumors he had been executed days earlier.
Iran has alleged, without providing evidence, that Akbari served as a source for Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, known popularly as MI6. A lengthy statement issued by Iran's judiciary claimed Akbari received large sums of money, his British citizenship and other help in London for providing information to the intelligence service.
However, Iran long has accused those who travel abroad or have Western ties of spying, often using them as bargaining chips in negotiations.
Akbari, who ran a private think tank, is believed to have been arrested in 2019, but details of his case only emerged in recent weeks. Those accused of espionage and other crimes related to national security are usually tried behind closed doors, where rights groups say they do not choose their own lawyers and are not allowed to see evidence against them.
Iranian state television aired a highly edited video of Akbari discussing the allegations, footage that resembled other claimed confessions that activists have described as coerced confessions.
The BBC Farsi-language service aired an audio message from Akbari on Wednesday, in which he described being tortured.
\u201cBy using physiological and psychological methods, they broke my will, drove me to madness and forced me to do whatever they wanted,\u201d Akbari said in the audio. \u201cBy the force of gun and death threats they made me confess to false and corrupt claims.\u201d Iran has not commented on the torture claims. However, the United Nations human rights chief has warned Iran against the \u201cweaponization\u201d of the death penalty as a means to put down the protests.<\/p>\n

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken condemned Akbari's execution.
\u201cWe mourn with his loved ones and will continue to hold Iran accountable for its sham trials and politicized executions,\u201d Blinken said.
Robert Malley, the U.S. special envoy for Iran, said he was \u201chorrified\u201d by Akbari\u2019s execution.
\u201cThe Islamic Republic\u2019s unjust detentions, forced confessions, sham trials and politically motivated executions must end,\u201d he wrote online.
French President Emmanuel Macron also decried what he called \u201ca heinous and barbaric act.\u201d German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock called the execution \u201ca further inhuman act by the Iranian regime.\u201d
Iran is one of the world\u2019s top executioners. However, it wasn't immediately clear when the last time a former or current high-ranking defense official had been executed. In 1984, Iran executed its navy chief Adm. Baharam Afzali along with nine other military people on a charge of spying for the Soviet Union.
Iran\u2019s government for months has been trying to allege \u2014 without offering evidence \u2014 that foreign countries have fomented the unrest gripping the Islamic Republic since the death of 22-year-old Amini in September after her detention by the morality police. Protesters say they are angry over the collapse of the economy, heavy-handed policing and the entrenched power of the country\u2019s Islamic clergy.
For several years, Iran has been locked in a shadow war with the United States and Israel, marked by covert attacks on its disputed nuclear program. The killing of Iran\u2019s top nuclear scientist in 2020, which Iran blamed on Israel, indicated foreign intelligence services had made major inroads. Iran mentioned that scientist in discussing Akbari's case, though it's unclear what current information, if any, he would have had on him.
Akbari had previously led the implementation of a 1988 cease-fire between Iran and Iraq following their devastating eight-year war, working closely with U.N. observers. He served as a deputy defense minister under Shamkhani during reformist President Mohammad Khatami's administration, likely further making his credentials suspicious to hard-liners within Iran's theocracy.
Today, Shamkhani is the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, the country's top security body, which Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei oversees. Akbari's audio message aired by the BBC Persian included him saying he was accused of obtaining top-secret information from Shamkhani \u201cin exchange for a bottle of perfume and a shirt.\u201d However, it appears Shamkhani remains in his role.
The anti-government protests now shaking Iran are one of the biggest challenges to the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution.
At least 522 protesters have been killed and 19,400 people have been arrested, according to Human Rights Activists in Iran, a group that has been monitoring the unrest. Iranian authorities have not provided official figures on deaths or arrests.
Iran has executed four people after convicting them of charges linked to the protests in similarly criticized trials, including attacks on security forces.
https:\/\/ca.news.yahoo.com\/iran-hangs-former-defense-ministry-054519179.html<\/p>\n

Iran: Stop Prosecuting Women Over Dress Code
Compulsory Hijab Laws Violate Women\u2019s Rights
https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2018\/02\/24\/iran-stop-prosecuting-women-over-dress-code<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s 1988 Mass Executions
Evidence & Legal Analysis of \u201cCrimes Against Humanity\u201d
https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2022\/06\/08\/irans-1988-mass-executions<\/p>\n

Iran: UN experts condemn execution of protestor, raise alarm about detained artists
https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/press-releases\/2022\/12\/iran-un-experts-condemn-execution-protestor-raise-alarm-about-detained
https:\/\/news.un.org\/en\/story\/2022\/12\/1131537<\/p>\n

IRAN 2021
Thousands of people were interrogated, unfairly prosecuted and\/or arbitrarily detained solely for peacefully exercising their human rights, and hundreds remained unjustly imprisoned. Security forces unlawfully used lethal force and birdshot to crush protests. Women, LGBTI people and ethnic and religious minorities faced entrenched discrimination and violence. Legislative developments further undermined sexual and reproductive rights, the right to freedom of religion and belief, and access to the internet. Torture and other ill-treatment, including denying prisoners adequate medical care, remained widespread and systematic. Judicial punishments of floggings, amputations and blinding were imposed. The death penalty was used widely, including as a weapon of repression. Executions were carried out after unfair trials. Systemic impunity prevailed for past and ongoing crimes against humanity related to prison massacres in 1988 and other crimes under international law.
https:\/\/www.amnesty.org\/en\/location\/middle-east-and-north-africa\/iran\/report-iran\/
Iran: Horrific wave of executions must be stopped<\/p>\n

The Iranian authorities have embarked on an execution spree, killing at least 251 people between 1 January and 30 June 2022, according to research by the Abdorrahman Boroumand Centre for Human Rights in Iran and Amnesty International. The organizations warned that if executions continue at this horrifying pace, they will soon surpass the total of 314
https:\/\/www.amnesty.org\/en\/latest\/news\/2022\/07\/iran-horrific-wave-of-executions-must-be-stopped\/ recorded for the whole of 2021<\/p>\n

Iran: UN experts say executions of child offenders must stop
https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/en\/press-releases\/2021\/12\/iran-un-experts-say-executions-child-offenders-must-stop<\/p>\n

SAVAGE CRUELTY Iran\u2019s executions and torture surging with hangings from cranes and guillotined fingers for crimes as petty as theft
https:\/\/www.the-sun.com\/news\/2390420\/iran-executions-torture-crane-chopped-fingers\/<\/p>\n

Capital punishment in Iran
Iran is believed to execute the most people per capita.[10] Iran insists that the execution numbers human rights groups allege are "exaggerated," and that executions are only carried out "after a lengthy judicial process." Iranian officials cite that they are "fighting a large-scale drug war along its eastern borders, and the increase of drug lords and dealers causes a rise in executions." According to the BBC, Iran "carries out more executions than any other country, except China".[11]
https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Capital_punishment_in_Iran
\u2003
TO: DEFENDANT RESPONDENT ISLAMIC EMIRATE OF AFGHANISTAN<\/p>\n

TO: Supreme Leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Incumbent
Hibatullah Akhundzada<\/p>\n

TO: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
https:\/\/mfa.gov.af\/en\/contact-english\/<\/p>\n

TO: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan<\/p>\n

Address of Mission
Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to the United Nations (Vienna)
K\u00e4rntner Ring 17\/12-15
1010 Vienna
Telephone: (+43-1) 402 1006
Fax: (+43-1) 402 1006
Email: permanentmission@afghanistan-vienna.org<\/p>\n

Permanent Representative
H.E. Ms. Manizha BAKHTARI
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
DPC: 15 Mar 21<\/p>\n

Alternate Permanent Representative
Mr. Fazull Mahmood RAHEMEE PAJWAK
Counsellor
Mrs. Saghar Pajwak
Mr. Mahboobullah AFKHAMI
First Secretary
Mrs. Zuhal AFKHAMI
Mr. Farhad GHIASSI
Second Secretary
Mrs. Lina Ghiassi
Mr. Ahmad Munir FARUHEE
Second Secretary
Samia Baharustani<\/p>\n

Advisor to the Permanent Representative
Ms. Masiha AKRAMI
First Secretary<\/p>\n

STATEMENT OF FACTS<\/p>\n

Women in Afghanistan Facing Numerous Taliban Restrictions in 2022
https:\/\/www.voanews.com\/a\/women-in-afghanistan-facing-numerous-taliban-restrictions-in-2022\/6868501.html<\/p>\n

One year ago, on 15 August 2021, the Taliban entered Afghanistan\u2019s capital city of Kabul and took control of the country.
Over the past 12 months, human rights violations against women and girls have mounted steadily. Despite initial promises that women would be allowed to exercise their rights within Sharia law\u2014including the right to work and to study\u2014the Taliban has systematically excluded women and girls from public life.
https:\/\/www.unwomen.org\/en\/news-stories\/in-focus\/2022\/08\/in-focus-women-in-afghanistan-one-year-after-the-taliban-takeover<\/p>\n

Afghanistan: Taliban Deprive Women of Livelihoods, Identity
Severe Restrictions, Harassment, Fear in Ghazni Province
Taliban rule has had a devastating impact on Afghan women and girls, new research shows, Human Rights Watch and the Human Rights Institute at San Jose State University (SJSU) said today. The organizations looked at the conditions for women since the Taliban took control in Ghazni province, in southeastern Afghanistan.
Since taking control of the city of Ghazni on August 12, 2021, days before entering Afghanistan\u2019s capital, Kabul, the Taliban have imposed rights-violating policies that have created huge barriers to women\u2019s and girls\u2019 health and education, curtailed freedom of movement, expression, and association, and deprived many of earned income. Afghanistan\u2019s rapidly escalating humanitarian crisis exacerbates these abuses. Following the Taliban takeover, millions of dollars in lost income, spiking prices, aid cut-offs, a liquidity crisis, and cash shortages triggered by former donor countries, especially the United States, have deprived much of the population of access to food, water, shelter, and health care.
\u201cAfghan women and girls are facing both the collapse of their rights and dreams and risks to their basic survival,\u201d said Halima Kazem-Stojanovic, a core faculty member of SJSU\u2019s Human Rights Institute and a scholar on Afghanistan. \u201cThey are caught between Taliban abuses and actions by the international community that are pushing Afghans further into desperation every day.\u201d
https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/news\/2022\/01\/18\/afghanistan-taliban-deprive-women-livelihoods-identity<\/p>\n

Taliban violations of women's rights in Afghanistan
12\/22\/2022 December 22, 2022
Since retaking power, the Taliban have reinstated draconian curbs on women's rights in Afghanistan. The most recent move, banning women from universities, has drawn international condemnation.
https:\/\/www.dw.com\/en\/taliban-violations-of-womens-rights-in-afghanistan\/a-64183079<\/p>\n

Afghanistan: Taliban ban women from universities amid condemnation
21 December 2022
The Taliban have banned women from universities in Afghanistan, sparking international condemnation and despair among young people in the country.
The higher education minister announced the regression on Tuesday, saying it would take immediate effect.
The ban further restricts women's education – girls have already been excluded from secondary schools since the Taliban returned last year.
Some women staged protests in the capital Kabul on Wednesday.
"Today we come out on the streets of Kabul to raise our voices against the closure of the girls' universities," protesters from the Afghanistan Women's Unity and Solidarity group said.
The small demonstrations were quickly shut down by Taliban officials.
Female students have told the BBC of their anguish. "They destroyed the only bridge that could connect me with my future," one Kabul University student said.
"How can I react? I believed that I could study and change my future or bring the light to my life but they destroyed it."
Another student told the BBC she was a woman who had "lost everything".
She had been studying Sharia Islamic law and argued the Taliban's order contradicted "the rights that Islam and Allah have given us".
"They have to go to other Islamic countries and see that their actions are not Islamic," she told the BBC.
The United Nations and several countries have condemned the order, which takes Afghanistan back to the Taliban's first period of rule when girls could not receive formal education.
The UN's Special Rapporteur to Afghanistan said it was "a new low further violating the right to equal education and deepens the erasure of women from Afghan society."
The US said such a move would "come with consequences for the Taliban".
"The Taliban cannot expect to be a legitimate member of the international community until they respect the rights of all in Afghanistan," said Secretary of State Antony Blinken in a statement.
"No country can thrive when half of its population is held back."
https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/world-asia-64045497<\/p>\n

The Taliban pledged to honor women\u2019s rights in Afghanistan. Here\u2019s how it eroded them instead
By Sophie Tanno, CNN
Published 8:41 PM EST, Fri December 23, 2022
CNN \u2014 When the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan in August 2021 in a lightning takeover following the withdrawal of US troops, the radical Islamist group appeared keen to distance itself from its earlier period of rule in the 1990s, presenting itself as more moderate and committed to the internal peace process.
Among its new commitments, the Taliban pledged to honor women\u2019s rights within the norms of \u201cIslamic law.\u201d
The group\u2019s spokesman Suhail Shaheen said at the time that women would be allowed to continue their education up to university \u2013 a break from the strict restrictions under the Taliban regime that ruled between 1996 and 2001.
The promises of a softer approach were met with skepticism, both within the country and abroad. Over a million Afghans have reportedly fled since the Taliban retook power.
Sixteen months on, the Taliban appear to have reneged on their word. Women and girls are facing blanket bans on education after a series of decrees steadily eroded their rights in almost all aspects of life and upended the gains they had fought tirelessly for over the past two decades.
Just days after retaking power, the Taliban reinstated the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice as a public morality watchdog tasked with enforcing the Taliban\u2019s version of Islamic law. The ministry has since been central to the systematic chipping away of women\u2019s rights in the country.
Here are some of the ways women\u2019s rights have been eroded:
Education
The Taliban announced on September 12, 2021, that women could attend universities with gender-segregated classrooms while wearing compulsory hijabs. But in March 2022, the government barred girls from attending secondary school. Girls\u2019 secondary schools were set to resume on March 23, 2021, after months-long closures imposed after the Taliban takeover. The group ordered them shut just hours after they were due to reopen. The move devastated many students and their families, who described to CNN their dashed dreams of becoming doctors, teachers or engineers.
In its latest step in the clampdown on women\u2019s education, the Taliban on Tuesday suspended university education for all female students. A letter published by the education ministry said the decision was made in a cabinet meeting and the order would go into effect immediately.
The Taliban have banned university education for women nationwide, provoking condemnation from the United States and the United Nations.
Public spaces
Women\u2019s access to public spaces has been significantly curtailed under the Taliban.
On November 10, women were banned from entering all parks in Kabul. Women had previously been allowed to visit parks three days a week, and men on the remaining four. The new rules mean that women are no longer allowed to do so, even if accompanied by male relatives.
The same day, a Taliban official in Kabul announced that women would be barred from using gyms across the country. A spokesperson from the ministry of virtue said the ban was being introduced due to people ignoring segregation orders and women not wearing the hijab.
Women in Afghanistan can no longer work in most sectors. The Taliban ordered working women to stay at home after their seizure of power in August 2021, saying they were not safe in the presence of the group\u2019s soldiers.
Travel
Women\u2019s right to travel within Afghanistan and abroad has also been restricted.
Late last year, it was announced that women would require a male escort to travel long distances within the country. Any woman traveling further than 75 kilometers (46 miles) was required to be accompanied by a male chaperone. Mohammad Sadiq Hakif Mahajer, spokesman for the virtue ministry, told CNN at the time that the new law was meant to prevent women from coming to any harm or \u201cdisturbance.\u201d
The new rules also called on drivers not to allow women who weren\u2019t wearing the hijab into their cars.
And in March, Afghanistan\u2019s airlines were ordered to stop women from boarding flights unless accompanied by a male chaperone, Reuters reported.
Women\u2019s attire
This summer, Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada ordered women to fully cover themselves, including their faces, in public. The decree suggested that women should stay at home where possible, as this was the \u201cbest option to observe the sharia hijab.\u201d
Prior to the order, hijabs were only mandatory for women studying at university and girls studying at secondary school. This was mandated in the immediate aftermath of the Taliban\u2019s return to power, when the new government said female students, lecturers and women in employment must wear hijabs in accordance with the group\u2019s interpretation of sharia law.
Taliban authorities have also ordered female television journalists to cover their faces while presenting.
A member of the Taliban replaces a sign of the Department for Women's Affairs with one of the Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice at a government building in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in October 2021.
A member of the Taliban replaces a sign of the Department for Women's Affairs with one of the Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice at a government building in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in October 2021.
Legal setbacks
Since sweeping back to power, the Taliban has abolished the Ministry of Women\u2019s Affairs, a key body to promote women\u2019s rights through law. In its place, the new regime set up the notorious Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, which has become instrumental in curtailing the rights of women.
It has also rolled back the Elimination of Violence against Women Law, signed in 2009 to protect women from abuses \u2013 including forced marriage, leaving them without recourse to justice, according to the UN.
Looking ahead
Over the past year, the Taliban\u2019s restrictions on women have increased international concern and are likely to further isolate the country on the world stage.
Commenting after the decision to ban women from university, US State Department spokesperson Ned Price said the move will \u201cfurther alienate the Taliban from the international community and deny them the legitimacy they desire.\u201d
US Ambassador Robert Wood, the alternate representative for special political affairs, echoed this sentiment, telling a United Nations Security Council briefing that the \u201cTaliban cannot expect to be a legitimate member of the international community until they respect the rights of all Afghans, especially the human rights and fundamental freedoms of women and girls.\u201d
The restrictive new measures could stir further unrest within the country. In the wake of the ban on university education, women on Thursday took to the streets of Kabul to protest the decision. The Taliban arrested five women taking part in the protest, according to the BBC.
https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2022\/12\/23\/asia\/taliban-women-freedoms-intl\/index.html<\/p>\n

\u2003
EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS
SERVICE OF PROCESS UPON
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT<\/p>\n

WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO REMOVE, ARREST, & INCARCERATE CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATORS FOR WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE & CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
\u201cThe lawful term writ of mandamus refers to an order by a court to a lesser government official to perform an act required by law, which he has refused or neglected to do. This type of court order is a remedy that may be sought if a governmental agency, public authority, or corporation in service of the government, fails or refuses to do its public or statutory duty.\u201d<\/p>\n

TO<\/p>\n

INTERPOL
https:\/\/www.interpol.int\/Contacts\/Contact-INTERPOL
support@safetender.com,
pcm-ao@interpol.int,
cfi.FFL@interpol.int,<\/p>\n

AUSTRALIA
TO:
Australia Federal Police
https:\/\/www.afp.gov.au\/
Report A Federal Crime:
NOSSC-Canberra@afp.gov.au,
NOSSC-Northern@afp.gov.au
PO Box 920, Spring Hill QLD 4004
NOSSC Eastern Command
(Sydney) NOSSC-Eastern@afp.gov.au
Locked Bag A3000, Sydney South NSW 1232
NOSSC Central Command
(Adelaide) NOSSC-Central@afp.gov.au
PO Box 200, Kent Town SA 5071
NOSSC Southern Command
(Melbourne and Hobart Office) NOSSC-Southern@afp.gov.au
GPO Box 485G, Melbourne VIC 3001
NOSSC Western Command
(Perth) NOSSC-Western@afp.gov.au
PO Box 586, West Perth WA 6872<\/p>\n

NEW ZEALAND
New Zealand National Police\/ Nga Pirihimana O Aotearoa
(+64 4 381 0000 mobile phones and international calls)
TO: https:\/\/www.police.govt.nz
optank@police.govt.nz.
payment@police.govt.nz,
ticket@police.govt.nz,<\/p>\n

USA<\/p>\n

To:
U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General
U.S. Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense
osd.pa.dutyofficer@mail.mil,
U.S. National Guard by State, Secretary of Defense
Metropolitan Police Department, Washington, DC, director.ouc@dc.gov,
Karl A. Racine, Attorney General, District of Columbia, oag@dc.gov,
US Capitol Police, USCapitolPolice@uscp.gov,
FBI https:\/\/www.fbi.gov\/contact-us\/field-offices<\/p>\n

UK<\/p>\n

Metropolitan Police<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.met.police.uk\/
+44 20 7230 1212 Call from abroad
\u2022 Commissioner: Cressida Dick
\u2022 Deputy Commissioner: Steve House
\u2022 Chief of Corporate Services: Robin Wilkinson
\u2022 Frontline Policing: Assistant Commissioner Nick Ephgrave
\u2022 Specialist Operations: Assistant Commissioner Matt Jukes
\u2022 Met Operations: Assistant Commissioner Louisa Rolfe
\u2022 Professionalism: Assistant Commissioner Helen Ball
\u2022 Chief Digital & Technology Officer: Director John Clarke<\/p>\n

new.scotland.yard@met.police.uk,<\/p>\n

USA STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL \u2013 VAXX COMPANIES<\/p>\n

Josh Shapiro
Attorney General
State of Pennsylvania [vs. Arbutus Biopharma]
EnvironmentalCrimes@attorneygeneral.gov,<\/p>\n

Letitia James
NY Attorney General [vs Defendant Pfizer, Inc]
NYAG.Pressoffice@ag.ny.gov,
Address of Massachusetts Attorney General
The address of Massachusetts Attorney General is 1350 Main Street, Fourth Floor, Springfield, MA-01103-1629, Massachusetts, United States.
Contact Number of Massachusetts Attorney General
The contact number of Massachusetts Attorney General is (413) 784-1240, (617) 727-2200.
Email Address of Massachusetts Attorney General
The email address of Massachusetts Attorney General is .
Website of Massachusetts Attorney General
The Website of Massachusetts Attorney General is www.mass.gov.<\/p>\n

digitalservices@mass.gov,<\/p>\n

CANADA<\/p>\n

TO: RCMP<\/p>\n

Michael Duheme Deputy Commissioner, Federal Policing Royal Canadian Mounted Police Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,<\/p>\n

Chief Superintendent DeAnna Hill, Newfoundland and Labrador Royal Canadian Mounted Police
DeAnna.Hill@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, Commanding Officer, Nova Scotia Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Lee.Bergerman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Assistant Commissioner Larry Tremblay, Commanding Officer, New Brunswick Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Assistant Commissioner Fran\u00e7ois Desch\u00eanes, Commanding Officer, Quebec Francois.Deschenes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Jennifer Ebert, Commanding Officer, Prince Edward Island. Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Jennifer.Ebert@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Matt Peggs, Criminal Operations Officer, O Division Ontario Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Matt.Peggs@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Commanding Officer, Ontario Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Jodie.Boudreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Rob Hill, Officer in Charge of Criminal Operations, Manitoba Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Rob.Hill@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Jane MacLatchy, Assistant Commissioner Manitoba Royal Canadian Mounted Police Jane.MacLatchy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Assistant Commissioner Rhonda Blackmore, Saskatchewan Royal Canadian Mounted Police Rhonda.Blackmore@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Deputy Commissioner Curtis Zablocki, Commanding Officer of Alberta Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Curtis.Zablocki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Dwayne McDonald Deputy Commissioner, Commanding Officer for E Division of British Columbia
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Dwayne.McDonald@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Deputy Commissioner Jennifer Strachan, Commanding Officer, "E" Division British Columbia Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Jennifer.Strachan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Brian Brennan Deputy Commissioner, Contract and Indigenous Policing Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Brian.Brennan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Frances McRae Chief Administrative Officer Royal Canadian Mounted Police Frances.McRae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Brenda Lucki Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Scott Sheppard, Commanding Officer, Yukon Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Scott.Sheppard@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Jamie Zettler, Commanding Officer, Northwest Territories Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Jamie.Zettler@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Chief Superintendent Amanda Jones, Commanding Officer, Nunavut Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Amanda.Jones@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,<\/p>\n

CONSTITUTIONAL SHERIFFS<\/p>\n

Sheriff Richard Mack
sheriffmack@hotmail.com,
Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association – CSPOA
https:\/\/cspoa.org<\/p>\n

Houston County – Sheriffs' Association of Texas
https:\/\/www.sheriffstx.org \u203a county_map \u203a county \u203a 2636
Houston County Sheriff Randy Hargrove, Sr. 700 S 4th St Ste A Crockett, TX 75835 (936) 544-2862 Fax: (936) 544-8061 Email:
rhargrove@co.houston.tx.us,<\/p>\n

Brown County Sheriff Vance Hill 1050 W Commerce Brownwood, TX 76801 (325) 646-5510 Fax: (325) 641-2419 Email:
vance.hill@browncountytx.org,<\/p>\n

Coryell County Sheriff Scott Williams 510 Leon Street Gatesville, TX 76528 (254) 865-7201 Fax: (254) 865-7774 Email:
swilliams@sheriff.co.coryell.tx.us,<\/p>\n

Sheriff's Office – Franklin County, Florida
https:\/\/www.franklincountyflorida.com \u203a constitutional-and-other-offices \u203a sheriffs-office
Contact Information: Sheriff A. J. "Tony" Smith 270 State Road 65 Eastpoint, FL 32328. Phone: (850) 670-8500 (Administrative Office & Communications) Phone: (850) 670-8519 (Administrative Office) Fax: (850) 670-8566 (Office) Fax: (850) 670-4019 (Jail) Emergencies: 911 Email: fcso@franklinsheriff.com,<\/p>\n

Canada \u2013 Constitutional Sheriffs<\/p>\n

Alberta Sheriffs
alberta.sheriffs@gov.ab.ca,
justin.brattinga@gov.ab.ca,<\/p>\n

UK \u2013 Constitutional Sheriffs<\/p>\n

https:\/\/commonlaw.earth\/uk\/sheriffs-duties\/<\/p>\n

Australia \u2013 Constitutional Sheriffs<\/p>\n

https:\/\/constitutionwatch.com.au\/category\/sheriff\/<\/p>\n

New Zealand \u2013 Constitutional Sheriffs<\/p>\n

SHERIFFS AND COMMON LAW COURTS MAY YET SAVE US!<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n