FIG.
A-Farsight: Mars industrial site with (a) nozzle spray and (b,c) domes
Related Articles
- Basiago
and Eisenhower reveal “Marsgate” and make case for “Alternative 4” - New
data, law of evidence support view of Mars having indigenous,
intelligent extraterrestrial life - Two
whistleblowers independently report teleporting to Mars and meeting
Martian extraterrestrials - Discovery
of life on Mars by Andrew D. Basiago chosen #1 UFO story of 2008
An apparent active industrial site on the surface of Mars
with a “large nozzle shooting a liquid spray” onto an apparent
industrial waste area has been successfully located and explored in
remote viewing study conducted by the Farsight Institute in March 2010 using nine highly
trained remote viewers and methodologies developed by the U.S.
military.
According to
the Farsight
Institute, the original discovery of the active industrial site and
giant
nozzle spray “was made by [Mars anomaly researcher] Patrick
Skipper” from photographs of the site taken by Jet
Propulsion Laboratories (JPL).
Reporter Alfred
Lambremont Webre attended a July 6, 2010 Montreal presentation of the
results Mars remote viewing study by Dr.
Courtney Brown, and the following is based on his notes.
During
the presentation, Dr. Brown indicated that tentative results of the
study, based on high clarity scores of the remote viewing sessions,
included the following:
• A large dome at the site is an
artificial structure;
• Tunnels connect various chambers
at the site;
• The original builders of the site were
ancient;
• Current occupants of the site do not understand
its original technology;
• The level of the original
technology is high;
• There is a shortage of spare parts
at the site;
• The site may be used for power or energy
generation;
• There are intense flashing lights at the
site;
• There is a sense of despondency among the
occupants of the site;
• There is a laboratory setting at
the site, occupants wear uniforms, and there are more men than women;
• The site occupants view this as a hardship post;
•
The site occupants cannot return home and knew that when they
accepted;
• There is No ET (extraterrestrial) content
detected at the site;
• The occupants at the site could be
human;
• The occupants of the site are of unknown origin;
• The site may be a black budget operation.
•
The remote viewing interpretations of the site may be a decoding error.
Corroboration
of Mars whistleblowers
As
discussed in this Examiner.com article, the results of this independent
remote viewing study of the Figure A Mars active industrial site appears
to provide corroboration of eyewitness testimony given to reporter
Alfred Lambremont Webre by whistleblowers who have visited or been
stationed at secret, black budget installations.
Dr.
Courtney Brown indicated to Alfred Lambremont Webre that he was unaware
of the testimony of these independent Mars whistleblowers.
Independent
Mars whistleblowers include former U.S. serviceman Michael Relfe,
former DARPA Project Pegasus participant Andrew D. Basiago, and former
DOD scientist Arthur Neumann. Michael Relfe has stated he was stationed
for 20 years (Mars time) at a U.S. secret installation on Mars. Andrew
D. Basiago has stated he visited U.S. secret installations on Mars
twice in 1981. Arthur Neumann has stated he visited Mars for a project
meeting at a secret U.S. installation at which Martian extraterrestrials
were present. All three whistleblowers independently state they were
transported to and from the U.S. secret Martian installations via
teleportation facilities. A fourth whistleblower, Laura Magdalene
Eisenhower, great granddaughter of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower,
has stated she was the target of a 2006 attempted enrollment in a secret
Mars colony.
A two-part video of Dr. Brown’s presentation of
the remote viewing study of the Figure A Mars industrial site is
available in the article below.
Seattle Exopolitics Examiner
http://www.examiner.com/x-
Al, no. This is wrong. What it is is a high wall [like the Great Wall of China] with a cistern [brightly sun-lit] on top, people walking around the base to the left, and human figures standing in a top-corner of the wall staring at the camera.
It’s people. There’s no industry here, and the “slice” is about one foot by 20 ft. WHY are these researchers AGREEING on something that isn’t real at all? I don’t understand.
The RESTORED and corrected photo is on my Profile page. Call me. This has me somewhat irate due to the fact such false info has been given a lot of publicity; and I’m going to keep hammering on it unless someone gives me a good reason not to.
Looks like inconclusive evidence to me, most likely ancient riverbeds and standard hills.