
Wiki commons: Dr.Judy Wood describes 9/11
molecular dissociation of WTC
This is the second of a
multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the
events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our
society.
In his article “False
Flag
Operations, 9-11 and the Exopolitical Perspective” Dr. Michael E.
Salla states, “The fourth
exopolitical
factor [of false flag operations] concerns the use of weather
modification technologies that former Secretary of State William Cohen
confirmed as existing in 1997.” The “weather modification technologies”
Dr. Salla is referring to include directed energy weapons which, by the evidence,
have been used in scalar, weather warfare and seismic false flag
operations such as December 26, 2004 (Boxing Day) Indonesian Tsunami,
the China earthquake of May 12, 2008, the Haiti earthquake of January
12, 2010, and the Chile earthquake of February 27, 2010.
Dr. Judy Wood,
a former assistant professor at Clemson University, has developed
compelling evidence that a directed energy weapon turned the physical
matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles through the
process of molecular dissociation. Dr. Wood demonstrates clear evidence
that cannot be accounted for by the official 9/11
Commission explanation or alternative theory of military planes,
cruise missiles, or other projectiles hitting the World Trade Center
buildings, or a controlled demolition caused solely by "advanced
explosive nano-thermitic
composite material found in the World Trade Center dust," or solely by
4th generation mini-nukes.
In a February 22, 2010 Washington Times article,
Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects &
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, states, "’Government officials will be
notified that 'Misprision of Treason,' U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a
serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason
to act,’ Mr. Gage says. ‘The implications are enormous and may have
profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial.’”
The trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed may soon begin (subject to
reported political negotiations with Republicans), as U.S. Attorney
General Eric Holder testified
before a U.S. House appropriations subcommittee on March 16, 2010 that
“a decision will be made in a matter of weeks on where to try the
alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks,” indicating that the Obama
administration has a pre-determined position on the evidence that the
events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation.
United
States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. "is the upcoming
trial of five alleged Al-Qaeda members for aiding the September 11, 2001
attacks. Charges were announced by Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann
on February 11, 2008 at a press conference at the Pentagon. The men
charged are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohammed al Qahtani, Ramzi
Binalshibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. In an 88-page
complaint, the group was charged with attacking civilians, attacking
civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, murder in
violation of the law of war, destruction of property in violation of
the law of war, hijacking or hazarding a vessel or aircraft, terrorism,
and providing material support for terrorism. If convicted, the five
will face the death penalty."
Regardless of whether U.S.
President Barack H. Obama chooses to have these defendants tried in a
U.S. Military Commission or in a U.S. Federal court, the evidence
amassed by such researchers as Dr. Judy Wood and Architects &
Engineers for 9/11 Truth satisfies the burden of proof that the events
of September 11, 2001 were, beyond a reasonable doubt, a false flag
operation. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United
States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al as a political show
trial, no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants
and the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from
other political show trials in recent history.
This Examiner.com
article in the continuing 9/11 series examines the evidence for the use
of secret advanced directed energy weapons in the molecular
dissociation of the World Trade Center buildings into nanoparticles on
September 11, 2001. The article discusses the implications of this
evidence, in light of Andrew D. Basiago’s eyewitness evidence
that a secret DARPA time travel program, whose defense liaison was then
Nixon Cabinet Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, was in physical possession
images of the World Trade Center 9/11 events in 1971, 30 years before
the actual events occurred on September 11, 2001. Mr. Rumsfeld, of
course, was U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11.
