Computer hacker Gary McKinnon lost his long battle to stand trial in the UK today when he was refused permission to appeal to the supreme court against extradition to the US on charges of breaking into the Pentagon's military networks.

The
court decided the case did not raise "points of law of general public
importance", which are neccessary if a case is to be pursued at the
higher level.

The decision extinguishes McKinnon's legal options
in the UK, but his lawyers said they would now consider applying to the
European court of human rights in Strasbourg.

Giving
the court's decision, Lord Justice Stanley Burnton, who heard
McKinnon's latest appeal earlier this year with Mr Justice Wilkie, said
extradition was "a lawful and proportionate response" to his alleged
offending.

He said McKinnon would be unlikely to succeed with his
claim that extradition would breach his right to a private and family
life, under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Nor
did the court think that extradition to the US would be a breach of his
right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment under
Article 3.

McKinnon's mother, Janis Sharp, said the decision was "devoid of humanity".

"No
other country in the world would so readily offer its citizens to the
US as sacrificial lambs merely to safeguard a 'special political
relationship'.

"To use my desperately vulnerable son in this way is despicable, immoral and devoid of humanity."

McKinnon's
solicitor, Karen Todner, said the trial was having a "devastating"
effect on the 43-year-old's health. "He is a highly vulnerable man in a
very fragile state and this is a huge blow to him and his family," she
said.

"Why is our government so inhumane as to allow this to
happen to someone, particularly someone with Asperger's, a form of
autism? This is the wholesale destruction and bullying of a small
individual by the United States and now our own government.

"Our extradition treaty with the US is unfair and prejudicial to UK citizens and should be repealed or amended immediately."

Todner said every further avenue, including the European court, would be explored.

Sabina
Frediani, campaigns co-ordinator for Liberty, which supported
McKinnon's case, said: "Never were justice and the law so out of sync
as in the case of Britain's rotten extradition arrangements. People up
and down the country are rightly horrified by the way that a vulnerable
man has been sold down the river when he should have been protected and
tried here at home."

She said Liberty would support any appeal to
the European court and would work to ensure parliament "faces up to its
responsibilities to amend the act".

McKinnon's lawyers and supporters argue his hacking was aimed at nothing more than searching for reports of UFO sightings.

McKinnon,
from Wood Green, north London, had challenged Home Office decisions
allowing his extradition to go ahead and the refusal of Keir Starmer
QC, the director of public prosecutions, to put him on trial in the UK
on charges of computer misuse. He failed in his high court bid to avoid
extradition in July.

The Home Office said no further comment would be made while McKinnon continued to pursue the legal avenues available to him.

A
spokesman said: "We note today's judgement. The case remains before the
courts. Therefore, we do not propose to comment further at this stage."