AP: Bush receiving History Making
Texan award on March 2, 2010
This article is the fourth of
a multi-part series on secret technologies, their application to the
events of September 11, 2001, and the consequent implications for our
society.
Former U.S. President George W. Bush, Vice
President Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
can each be prosecuted for murder by a U.S. attorney, by a district
attorney or by a non-U.S. state prosecutor whose citizens were killed at
the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag operation on
September 11, 2001. The prima facie evidence for prosecuting
Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld for murder is contained in a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress, Parts IV – VII of
which published in the Examiner.com article below.
In 2008, former
Los Angeles assistant District Attorney and author Vincent
Bugliosi presented the legal framework for the prosecution of former George W. Bush for murder
in having intentionally misled the U.S. Congress in taking the U.S. to
war in Iraq. This reporter, Alfred Lambremont Webre, has successfully
presented the legal framework for the prosecution of Bush, Cheney
and Rumsfeld for murder for having knowingly engaged in command and
control operations in the false flag operation of 9/11 that
intentionally led to the deaths of approximately 2830 innocent civilians and
emergency responders at or around the World Trade Center.
In Memo to U.S. Congress: prima facie evidence that
Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed treason on 9/11,
Examiner.com reported how a Memorandum to the U.S. Congress presented to
then incoming Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary
Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich), following the November 2006
mid-term elections sets out prima facie evidence for the
appointment of an independent prosecutor to prosecute then U.S.
President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and numerous Jane and John Does
for treason under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution for acts
committed on September 11, 2001.
One source states, “In common
law jurisdictions, prima facie denotes evidence which – unless
rebutted – would be sufficient to prove a particular proposition or
fact. For example, in a trial under Criminal law the prosecution has the
burden of presenting prima facie evidence of each element of the crime
charged against the defendant.” The source continues: “Murder,
as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another
human being with intent (or malice aforethought), and generally this
state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful
homicide (such as manslaughter). As the loss of a human being inflicts
enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the
fact that the commission of a murder deprives the victim of their
existence, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered
it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. A person
convicted of murder is typically given a life sentence or even the death
penalty for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a
murderer.”
The Memorandum to the U.S. Congress is still on the
desk of Rep. John Conyers, Jr. awaiting further action by the U.S.
Judiciary Committee. However, as this Examiner.com article
demonstrates, prima facie evidence exists for a U.S. attorney, a
district attorney or a non-U.S. state prosecutor whose citizens were
killed at the World Trade Center or in any aspect of the false flag
operation on September 11, 2001 to prosecute Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, Mr.
Rumsfeld for murder.
The false flag operation of 9/11 is not an
academic issue. NATO heads of state, from U.S. President Barack
H. Obama to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper routinely still employ "9/11" as the
political and symbolic pretext for a war in Afghanistan, and for the
expansion of police state measures domestically and in the world’s
travel, banking and financial matrix. In a 2006 paper entitled, “False
Flag Operations, 9/11, and the Exopolitical Perspective”, Dr.
Michael E. Salla writes: “According to an August 2006 Scripps
Howard/Ohio University national survey, 36% of Americans believe 9-11
was an ‘inside job’ with government agencies complicit in what
occurred. A Zogby poll in May 2006 found that 42% of Americans believed
that official explanations and the 9-11 Commission were covering up the
truth.”
