Legal Standing of the Natural and Common Law Tribunal for Public Health and Justice – A Summary/”Private Tribunals of Conscience Their History and Why They Matter”

Universal Jurisdiction: International Criminal Code

“Universal jurisdiction may be asserted by a particular nation as well as by an international tribunal. The result is the same: individuals become answerable for crimes defined and prosecuted regardless of where they live, or where the conduct occurred; crimes said to be so grievous as to be universally condemned…. since the end of the Second World War over fifteen states have conducted investigations, commenced prosecutions and completed trials based on universal jurisdiction for the crimes or arrested people with a view to extraditing the persons to a state seeking to prosecute them. These states include: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Mexico, Netherlands, Senegal, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.”

“The Center for Constitutional Rights tried first in Switzerland and then in Canada to prosecute former US President George W. Bush on behalf of persons tortured in US detention camps, invoking the universal jurisdiction doctrine. Bush cancelled his trip to Switzerland after news of the planned prosecution came to light. Bush has traveled to Canada but the Canadian government shut down the prosecution in advance of his arrest.[21] The Center has filed a grievance with the United Nations for Canada's failure to invoke universal jurisdiction to enforce the Convention Against Torture, a petition on which action is pending.”

“To implement the Rome Statute, Canada passed the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Michael Byers, a University of British Columbia law professor, has argued that these laws go further than the Rome Statute, providing Canadian courts with jurisdiction over acts pre-dating the ICC and occurring in territories outside of ICC member-states;” as a result, anyone who is present in Canada and alleged to have committed genocide, torture … anywhere, at any time, can be prosecuted [in Canada].

118 Nations Ratifying the International Criminal Court Statute

This is a list of the 118 Nations ratifying the International Criminal Court Statute whose National Courts may have Universal Jurisdiction over war crimes,

https://tinyurl.com/yxne8bgp

NOTE: Key members of the criminal co-conspiracy of named and unnamed Defendants herein reside in the People's Republic of China, the United States of America, the State of Israel, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Russian Federation, nations that are not signatories or ratifiers of the International Criminal Court-Rome Statute. Therefore such Defendants fall under the Universal Jurisdiction of National Courts of the 118 nations that have signed and ratified the International Criminal Court-Rome Statute, and fall under the Universal Jurisdiction of this Court. As the UK has ratified the International Criminal Code, Defendants residing in the United Kingdom fall under the jurisdiction of UK Courts as well as the National Courts of the other 117 ratifying Nations.

For example, individuals in the United States of America such as Bill Gates and Anthony Stephen Fauci, MD, who along with other named and unnamed Defendants in a criminal conspiracy, has committed and continues to commit 5G/AI Coronavirus-related international crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity as documented publicly by the President of Ghana, may be sued for genocide and crimes against humanity in the courts of Ghana under Universal Jurisdiction using the International Criminal Code.

Common Law Court Great Britain & International, and Other Common Law Courts worldwide

This Sample Request for a Writ of Emergency Injunction may be adapted and filed for action with the Common Law Court Great Britain & International, and Other Common Law Courts worldwide

See: www.commonlawcourt.com

 …..

Definitions of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity

(1) Genocide – As defined in Article 6 of the International Criminal Code, For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a)   Killing members of the group;

(b)  Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c)   Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d)  Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e)   Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

(2) Crimes Against Humanity – As defined in Article 7 of the International Criminal Code, For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a)   Murder;

(b)  Extermination;

(c)   Enslavement;

(d)  Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e)   Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f)   Torture;

(g)   Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h)  Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i)   Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j)   The crime of apartheid;

(k)  Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a)   “Attack directed against any civilian population” means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

(b)  “Extermination” includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;

(c)   “Enslavement” means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in particular women and children;

(d)  “Deportation or forcible transfer of population” means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;

(e)   “Torture” means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

(f)   “Forced pregnancy” means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;

(g)   “Persecution” means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity;

(h)  “The crime of apartheid” means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;

(i)  “Enforced disappearance of persons” means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.

3. For the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term “gender” refers to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term “gender” does not indicate any meaning different from the above.

EXHIBIT I – Selected Press Coverage of the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal Trial for War Crimes and Genocide in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo, Cuba

Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia tribunal/ Judgment of the Court (PDF)

https://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2019/06/bush-blair-found-guilty-of-war-crimes-in-malaysia-tribunal-judgment-of-the-court-pdf.html

Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

Read Extempore Judgment of the KL War Crimes Tribunal (PDF)

Download Extempore Judgment of the KL War Crimes Tribunal

WATCH TV NEWS: http://presstv.com/detail/211548.html

Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia tribunal
Mahi Ramakrishnan, Press TV, Kuala Lumpur
Tue Nov 22, 2011 6:51PM GMT

Former US president George Bush and his former counterpart Tony Blair were found guilty of war crimes by the The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal which held a four day hearing in the Malaysia.

The five panel tribunal unanimously decided that Bush and Blair committed genocide and crimes against peace and humanity when they invaded Iraq in 2003 in blatant violation of international law.

The judges ruled that war against Iraq by both the former heads of states was a flagrant abuse of law, act of aggression which amounted to a mass murder of the Iraqi people.

In their verdict, the judges said that the United States, under the leadership of Bush, forged documents to claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

They further said the findings of the tribunal be made available to members of the Rome Statute and the names of Bush and Blair be entered into a war crimes register.

Both Bush and Blair repeatedly said the so-called war against terror was targeted at terrorists.

Lawyers and human rights activists present here say the verdict by the tribunal is a landmark decision. And the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Foundation said it would lobby the International Criminal Court to charge former US president George Bush and Former British prime minister Tony Blair for war crimes.

Source: http://presstv.com/detail/211548.html

 

KL tribunal convicts two former leaders with ‘crimes against peace’

 PETALING JAYA: The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal unanimously found former United States president George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of “crimes against peace”.

The tribunal found that the two had planned, prepared and invaded the state of Iraq on March 19, 2003, in violation of the United Nations Charter and international law.

“The charge is proven beyond reasonable doubt. The accused are found guilty,” read an official media statement from Perdana Global Peace Foundation, organisers of the tribunal.

“War criminals have to be dealt with, convict Bush and Blair as charged. A guilty verdict will serve as a notice to the world that war criminals may run but can never ultimately hide from truth and justice,” the statement read.

The tribunal noted that the UN Security Council Resolution 1441 did not authorise any use of force against Iraq but the US proceeded to invade Iraq under the pretext of the Sept 11 attacks and weapons of mass destruction.

“Weapons investigators had established that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was also not posing any threat to any nation at the relevant time that was immediate that would have justified any form of pre-emptive strike.”

With the findings, the tribunal has ordered that Bush and Blair’s names be included in the war register of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission.

It also ordered the findings of the tribunal to be publicised to all nations who are signatories of the Rome Statute.

The tribunal, held for four days here, was initiated by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who is also the Perdana Global Peace Foundation president.

The tribunal members were Datuk Abdul Kadir Sulaiman, Tunku Sofiah Jewa, Prof Salleh Buang, Alfred Lambremont Webre and Prof Emeritus Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi.

Prof Niloufer Bhagwat and Datuk Zakaria Yatim were recused as tribunal members.

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/11/23/courts/9959222&sec=courts

Full coverage

George W. Bush, Tony Blair found guilty of war crimes … in Malaysia National Post (blog) - ‎9 hours ago‎ KUALA LUMPUR — Former US President George W. Bush and British ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair have been found guilty at a mock tribunal in Malaysia for committing “crimes against peace” during the Iraq war. The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal, … Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia tribunal Press TV - ‎3 hours ago‎ Former US president George Bush and his former counterpart Tony Blair were found guilty of war crimes by the The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal which held a four day hearing in the Malaysia. The five panel tribunal unanimously decided that Bush and … Tony Blair and George W Bush found guilty of 'crimes against peace' The Economic Voice - ‎1 hour ago‎ “The Tribunal deliberated over the case and decided unanimously that the first accused George Bush and second accused Blair have been found guilty of crimes against peace.” said a tribunal statement. The pair were tried in absentia by a panel chaired … Bush, Blair guilty in Malaysia 'war crimes trial' Montreal Gazette - ‎9 hours ago‎ US President George W. Bush (L) shares a laugh with British Prime Minister Tony Blair KUALA LUMPUR – Former US president George W Bush and British ex-prime minister Tony Blair were Tuesday found guilty at a mock tribunal in Malaysia for committing … Malaysian Tribunal Finds Bush, Blair Guilty of War Crimes The Mark - ‎3 hours ago‎ Well, it looks like George W. Bush and Tony Blair won't be getting to enjoy cosmopolitan Kuala Lampur or the sandy beaches of Redang any time soon, as a tribunal in Malaysia has found both former heads of state to be guilty of committing war crimes. … Symbolic Malaysian trial finds Bush, Blair guilty of 'crimes against peace … Washington Post - ‎21 minutes ago‎ Malaysia's outspoken former leader Mahathir Mohamad founded a peace organization that set up the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal specifically for trying Bush and Blair. Mahathir's son, Mukhriz Mahathir, said international judges and lawyers convicted … George Bush and Tony Blair Found Guilty of War Crimes by Kuala Lumpur War … eNews Park Forest - ‎21 minutes ago‎ KUALA LUMPUR—(ENEWSPF)–22 November 2011 – The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal (Tribunal) has found George Bush and Tony Blair guilty of committing "crimes against peace" during the Iraq war. eNews Park Forest is an independently owned and operated …